Iranian EFL Learners’ Opinions about Teachers’ Oral Corrective Feedback Strategies: Are their Opinions in line ith their teachers’ actual classroom practices?

سال انتشار: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 804

فایل این مقاله در 14 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELLTE01_115

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 شهریور 1394

چکیده مقاله:

In an attempt to learn more about Iranian EFL learners’ opinions towards their teachers’actual error correction practices, this study tried to investigate Iranian EFL learners’ opinionsabout their teachers’ error correction practices and also to see what kind of feedback (direct orindirect) their teachers applied during oral error correction in this research context. To this end,one self-reporting corrective feedback questionnaire and an observation chick-list were used tocollect the related data in this regard. The rating scale of the questionnaire was a five point Likertscale. After data analysis, the results indicated that the Iranian EFL learners’ opinions aboutcorrective feedback were not in line with their teachers’ actual error correction practices, thatthey wanted to receive corrective feedback indirectly but their teachers provided it directly.Therefore, the implication of this study can be that EFL teachers should take into account theirlearners’ opinions about oral corrective feedback strategies that they use during classroominteraction.

نویسندگان

Amir Mahdavi Zafarghandi

P.h.D- Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Guilan,Rasht, Iran

Davoud Abedi

M.A- Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Guilan,Rasht, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the ...
  • Carroll, S. E. & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit ...
  • Fukuda, Y. (2004). Treatment of spoken errors in Japanese high ...
  • Ellis, R. & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of ...
  • Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (2008). Second Language Acquisition: An ...
  • Hampl, M. (2011). Error and error correction in classroom conversation ...
  • November 2012, from _ : _ .uniie.ac. ...
  • at/141 38/1/201 1 -03 -30_040777 1 .pdf. ...
  • Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. ...
  • Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom ...
  • Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback _ learner ...
  • Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., M., & Spada, N. (2001).Recasts as ...
  • Vienna, Austria. Retrieved On at/141 38/1/201 1 -03 -30_040777 1 ...
  • Othman, W. M. (2010). The Role of Feedback in Malaysian ...
  • Panova, I. & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback ...
  • Spada, N. & Frohlich, M. (1995). Commun ication orientation of ...
  • Tomkova, G. (2013). Error Correction in Spoken Practice (Master's Diploma ...
  • Truscott, J. (1999). What's wrong with oral grammar correction. The ...
  • Ur, P. (2012). Accuracy and error correction [PowerPoint slides] .Autumn ...
  • Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers" choice and learners preference of corrective ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع