Comparison Of Emotion Regulation, And Early Maladaptive Schemas In Obese And Normal-Weight Women

The role of maladaptive schemas and emotional dysregulation in obesity remains a debated topic in health psychology. Some theoretical frameworks suggest that these psychological challenges contribute to both normal and emotional eating, reinforcing indulgent eating behaviors that may ultimately lead to obesity. Recognizing these factors could provide valuable insights into the mental health dynamics influencing obesity. The current study aimed to compare the prevalence of emotional dysregulation and maladaptive schemas between obese and healthy-weight women. Using a causal-comparative design, we assessed ۸۰ women—۳۹ with obesity and ۴۱ with normal weight—using the Young Early Maladaptive Schema Questionnaire (YEMSQ) and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). Results revealed significantly higher levels of maladaptive schemas and lower emotion regulation capacities in the obese group compared to healthy-weight participants. These differences suggest that emotional dysregulation and maladaptive schemas are more pronounced in individuals with obesity, possibly influencing maladaptive eating behaviors. Given the potential impact of these psychological factors on eating patterns, therapeutic interventions targeting emotional regulation and schema-focused therapy may be effective in improving coping mechanisms and reducing maladaptive behaviors associated with obesity. Further research is necessary to explore the specific psychological pathways linking emotional dysregulation and maladaptive schemas to obesity, and to refine intervention strategies.

کلیدواژه ها:

Emotion regulation ، Early maladaptive schemas ، Obesity ، Cognition