The Effect of Corrective Feedback Strategies via Email on Writing Accuracy Improvement; A case of Iranian EFL Learners

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 541

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

CRSTCONF02_360

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 21 شهریور 1395

چکیده مقاله:

Indubitably, The efficacy of feedback has long been an area of great interest in recent years. In this respect the importance of Corrective feedback in learning has taken the notice of scholars. There are various strategies of providing corrective feedback which are the aims of this present article. In addition, student writing in different contexts of ESL/EFL has heightened the need for this study, too. Accordingly, the main objective of the present study was to investigate the provision of corrective feedback on student writing via new media of communication as Email and Microsoft Word software.To this end, from the population of 84 Iranian EFL students of higher intermediate levels, 4 groups of indirect feedback (IF), direct feedback (DF), indirect followed by direct with explicit corrective comments (IDECC), and no feedback (NF) were selected. these groups were observed concerning the impact of feedback each group received the results of this study are in line with the effectiveness of corrective feedback in student writing The analysis of the data revealed that all three treatment groups achieved better results than the control group after two stages of revisions . Among treatment groups, the IDECC which received instruction of both strategies of providing feedback gained the most impact in the new essay and in a long run.

نویسندگان

Amir Mahshanian

University of Isfahan

Mohammad Bahrami

University of Shahrekord

Farid Mousavi Shakhe

University of Isfahan

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Guenette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues ...
  • Jokar, M., & Soyoof, A. (2014). The Influence of Written ...
  • Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of ...
  • Rahimi, M., & Asadi, E. (2014). Effect of Different Types ...
  • Rob, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of ...
  • Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign ...
  • Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a ...
  • Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع