Power Relations among Different Test Parties from the Perspective of Critical Language Assessment

سال انتشار: 1392
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 231

فایل این مقاله در 24 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-31-4_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Critical Language Assessment (CLA) argues that language testing is a form of social practice and an agent of cultural, social, educational as well as ideological agendas. As such this article scrutinized the power that different groups of people including, teachers, students and their parents own at the levels of developing, administrating and interpreting Iranian University Entrance Examinations (IUEE). The study revealed that tests could be tools of power that serve the empowered parties’ policies and manipulate individual lives. Supported by the findings, the article (۱) could be conducive to developing critical thinking among students to see behind the tests, and (۲) suggests more democratic testing methods to moderate high-stakes tests consequences so that individual rights get protected.

نویسندگان

Sohila Tahmasebi

Ph.D. Candidate, TEFL Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University

Morteza Yamini

Assistant Professor, TEFL Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Akiyama, T. (2003). Assessing speaking in Japanese junior high schools: ...
  • Auerbach, E. (1995). The politics of the ESL classroom: Issues ...
  • Barootchi, N., & Keshavarz, M.H. (2002). Assessment of achievement through ...
  • Bloor, M. and Bloor, Th. (2007) The Practice of Critical ...
  • Bourdieu, P.  (1991) Language and symbolic power. Oxford: polity Press. ...
  • Broadfoot, P. (1996) Education, assessment and society. Buckingham: Open University ...
  • Coleman, D.,  Starfield, S., & Hagan, A.  (2003). Stakeholder perceptions ...
  • Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second Language Research. Mahwah NJ: ...
  • Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: quantitative, qualitative ...
  • Hanson, F. A. (1993). Testing testing: social consequences of the ...
  •  Hamayan, E. V. (1995). Approaches to alternative assessment. Annual Review ...
  • Kramsch, C.  (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: ...
  • Farhady, H. (1998). A critical review of the English section ...
  • Farhady, H. (2006). Twenty-five years of living with applied linguistics: ...
  • Farhady, H., & Hedayati, H. (2009). Language assessment policy in ...
  • Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the ...
  • Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology ...
  • Lynch, B. K. (2001). Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective. ...
  • Mahdavinia, M.  Rahimi, A. (2011). An evaluative case study: Reflection-focused ...
  • McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman. ...
  • McNamara, T., & Roever, K. (2006). Language testing:  The social ...
  • McIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory. ...
  • Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in ...
  • Messick, S. (1996). Validity and wash back in language testing, ...
  • Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an ...
  • Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, ...
  • Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied Linguistics: A critical introduction. London: ...
  • Rahimi & Sahragard. (2006,). A critical discourse analysis of euphemization ...
  • Rea-Dickins, P. (1997). So why we need relationship with stakeholders ...
  • Riazi, A.M.  & Razavipour, K. (2011). Agency of EFL teachers ...
  •  Saif, S. (2006). Aiming for positive washback: a case study ...
  • Shepard, L. (1991). Psychometricians’ beliefs about learning. Educational Researcher, 20 ...
  • Shohamy, E. (1997). Testing methods, testing consequences: Are they ethical? ...
  • Shohamy, E. (1998) Critical language testing and beyond, Studies in ...
  • Shohamy, E. (2001a) Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing, ...
  •        www.people.iup.edu/.../Democratic%20Assessment%20as%20an%20... ...
  • Shohamy, E. (2001b). The power of tests: a critical perspective ...
  • Shohamy, E.  (2007) Language tests as language policy tools. Assessment ...
  • Spolsky, B. (1997). The ethics of gatekeeping tests: What have ...
  • Spolsky, B. (2007). Towards a theory of language policy. Working ...
  • Tsagari, D. (2004). Is there life beyond language testing? An ...
  •  Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). The discourse-knowledge interface. In G. ...
  • Wade, C. (1995). Using writing to develop and assess critical ...
  • Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidenced-based ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع