An Investigation of the Prepositional Errors Made by Iranian EFL Learners While Speaking English

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 471

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

LPMCONF01_1169

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 7 اردیبهشت 1396

چکیده مقاله:

Using prepositions accurately while speaking has a significant role in having an effective communication. However, because of the large number of prepositions, EFL students are sometimes confused in choosing the correct one and commit errors. Therefore, studying the different types of prepositional errors and their frequency needs further attention. This can help EFL teachers to predict EFL learners’ errors and try to help them learn how to use prepositions more accurately. The aim of the present study was to analyze different types of prepositional errors made by Iranian EFL university students while speaking English in the class. For so doing, during the Fall Semester of 2112 academic year, the authentic presentations/conversations/dialogues of students in the class were recorded. The corpus was then transcribed and analyzed in order to identify different types and frequency of prepositional errors made by the learners. In general, the errors were divided into five major prepositional problems and each problem was divided into three categories of: omission, addition, and wrong use. It was revealed that most errors that students committed were the wrong use of prepositions after the verbs and it also indicated that students did not use any preposition plus preposition format in their speaking. The results were discussed and the pedagogical implications were made.

نویسندگان

Mahtab Akar

MA Student of Translation Studies, Department of English Language, University of Birjand, Iran,

Hossein Navidinia

Assistant Professor of TEFL, Department of English Language, University of Birjand, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Bhela, B. (1999). Native language interference in ...
  • Internationa Congress on Language and Literature October 06 2016 ...
  • learning a second language: Exploratory case studies of native language ...
  • Brown, H. D. (201 4). Principles of Language Learning and ...
  • Course in Applied Linguistics. Ed. Alien, J.P.B. and Corder, S.P. ...
  • Flowerdew, 1.(1 999) A corpus based-analysis of ...
  • Kafipour, R., & Khojasteh, L. (2012). A ...
  • Koosha, M., & Jafarpour, A. A. (20 06). Data-driven ...
  • Richards, J. (1974). A _ -contrastive approach to ...
  • Scovel, T. (20 _ 1). Learning New Languages: A ...
  • guide to second language acquisition. Massachsetts Heinle & Heinle. ...
  • Swan M. (1 988) Practical English Usage-Fully ...
  • Celce-Murcia, M., & Lars en-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: ...
  • Corder, S. P. "Error Analysis. (1974). " Techniques in Applied ...
  • Dulay, Heidi C., and Burt. M. K. (1 974)."Natural scquences ...
  • Flowerdew, 1.(1 999) A corpus based-analysis of ...
  • 0] Mukattash, L. (1976). Persistence in fossilization. International Review of ...
  • Internationa Congress on Language and Literature October 06 2016 ...
  • Tahaineh, Y. S. (20 09). A cross-sectional ...
  • Revised- Third Edition Hongkong: OXFORD University Press. [14] Tahaineh, Y. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع