Identify and Ranking The Most Important Criterias of Company Ranking Using AHP

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 636

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICESCON03_279

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 شهریور 1395

چکیده مقاله:

Stock market performance is important at the stage of economic growth. On the other hand, in practice it is not sufficient to evaluate the options according to the simplest form of decision making only based on a criterion. In such cases, we must consider all the variety of different information to decide to best option. It arise the requirement of multi-criteria decision making methods. One of the most important financial issues of companies is performance evaluation. Hence investors consider it as a major criterion to choose the company to invest in. Traditionally it was common to use accounting information for performance evaluation. Many companies applied some basic accounting variables such as sales, profit, and return on sales. Many studies are focused on performance evaluation of companies, defining relation between financial methods and their impact on performance of companies. In this research used AHP method to ranking the most important criterias to influence the petrochemical companies efficiency based on financial and non-financial criterias. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multiple criteria decision-making methodology designed to help decision makers in prioritizing decisions that involves both tangible and intangible criteria and has been implemented extensively all over the world

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Fahimeh Najafvand- Drikvandi

Department of Economic & Management, Shahid Chamran University, Ahwaz, Khuzestan

Hasan Ali Sinaei

Department of Economic & Management, Shahid Chamran University, Ahwaz, Khuzestan

Abdolhossein Neysi

Department of Economic & Management, Shahid Chamran University, Ahwaz, Khuzestan

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced ...
  • Alissa, W., Samuel, B., Bonsall I., Kevin K., Michael W. ...
  • Bassioni, H.A., Price, A.D.F. and Hassan, T.M. (2004). Performance Measuremen ...
  • Cakir, O. (2008). On the order of the preference inference ...
  • Demireli, E. (2010). TOPSIS Multi-criteria Decision-M aking Method: An Examination ...
  • Kagioglou, _ Cooper, R. and Aouad, G. (2001). Performance Management ...
  • Keshvari, A. and Alirezaee, M. R. (2008). Ranking Efficient Units ...
  • Lin, C.T., Lee, C. and Wu, C.S. (2009). Optimizing d ...
  • Meade, L. M. and Sarkis, J. (1999). Analyzing organizational project ...
  • Nepal, B., Yadav, Om P. and Murat, A. (2010). A ...
  • Saaty. T. L. and Penivati, K. (2008). Group decision making: ...
  • Saaty, T. L. and Kearns, K. P. (1985). Analytical Planning: ...
  • Sehhat, S., Taheri, M. and Hosseinabdi Sadeh, D. (2015). Ranking ...
  • Sheikh, M, J. (2010). Assess the financial performance of the ...
  • Wu, J. H. and Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring ERP ...
  • Yalcin, N., B ayrakdaroglu, A. and Kahraman, C. (2012). Application ...
  • Zahedi, F. (1986). The Analytic Hierarchy Process-A Survey of the ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع