Strategies, practices, and challenges in enhancing quality assurance in qualitative biomedical research: A multi-method study protocol

سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 25

متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JGBFNM-22-1_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 15 خرداد 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Background: The qualitative research paradigm is crucial for understanding complex human phenomena, making credibility essential for its findings. Challenges in applying quality assessment criteria and promoting responsible practices in biomedical research underscore the need to review strategies, practices, and challenges in evaluating the quality of qualitative research. This protocol aims to support a multi-method study that develops evidence-informed, comprehensive, and practical recommendations to enhance quality assurance in qualitative research within the biomedical field. Methods: This multi-method study protocol consists of three phases: a systematic scoping review, qualitative content analysis, and a Delphi survey. The scoping review will follow Arksey and O’Malley’s five-step approach, using relevant keywords to guide a systematic search across databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, with no time restrictions. Qualitative content analysis will follow Graneheim and Lundman’s (۲۰۰۴) method. Purposeful sampling will be used to select experts in qualitative research. Semi-structured interviews will collect their experiences in evaluating qualitative research quality. Based on the review and interview findings, comprehensive, evidence-informed, and practical recommendations within the biomedical field will be developed and further refined using the Delphi method. Conclusion: This study aims to critically examine quality achievement and evaluation in the qualitative paradigm and identify challenges, practices, and strategies through a review of existing evidence, focusing on related experiences and perceptions. The study also seeks to address gaps and controversies in the literature using qualitative content analysis. Ultimately, the goal is to develop comprehensive, evidence-informed, and practical recommendations to enhance quality assurance in qualitative research.

نویسندگان

Hamidreza Khankeh

QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Berlin, Germany ; Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, Social Health Research Institute, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mohammad Saatchi

Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, Social Health Research Institute, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mahdieh Motie

Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nursing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Department of Nursing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Shima Shirozhan

Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, Social Health Research Institute, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Nursing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ulrich Dirnagl

QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Berlin, Germany

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Khankeh H, Shirozhan S, Hoseini Z, Negarandeh R. Applied qualitative ...
  • Holloway I, Galvin K. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. ...
  • Speziale HS, Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: ...
  • Hamedanchi A, Zanjari N, Khankeh HR, Abolfathi Momtaz Y. Hermeneutic ...
  • Kornbluh M. Combatting challenges to establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research. ...
  • Assarroudi A, Heshmati Nabavi F, Armat MR, Ebadi A, Vaismoradi ...
  • Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and ...
  • Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ...
  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of ...
  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: ...
  • Leeflang MM. Responsible research: using the right methodology. Clin Microbiol ...
  • Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J. Responsible research and innovation: ...
  • Tijdink JK, Horbach SP, Nuijten MB, O'Neill G. Towards a ...
  • Von Schomberg R. A vision of responsible research and innovation. ...
  • Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. ...
  • Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, ...
  • Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع