To Keep or to Leave: Unlocking the Efficiency of General English Course in Iranian Context

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 114

فایل این مقاله در 24 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JALST-3-1_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 خرداد 1404

چکیده مقاله:

General English Course (GEC), considering its syllabus, is a misnomer for the English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instruction in Iran. The major goal of GEC, as set by the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, is to help undergraduate students develop a reasonable ability to read and comprehend their reference textbooks in their majors. Since a lot of time, money, and energy are spent on GEC and given the dropout rate among students, its efficiency needs to be evaluated meticulously. This study was an attempt to assess the efficiency of GEC in achieving its purported objectives. Two hundred and sixty-six university students taking their GEC sat for the pretest of the study in order to get a preliminary profile of their reading comprehension ability as well as their knowledge of vocabulary. After ۱۵ sessions of treatment, based on the GEC syllabus, the learners took a posttest. Results of a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test revealed an improvement from the pretest to the posttest, which is negligible with regard to a small effect size. This state of affairs denotes that GEC has not achieved its goals completely. The implications of the study for policymakers, curriculum developers, and educators are discussed.

کلیدواژه ها:

EAP ، ESP ، Evaluation ، General English Course (GEC) ، semi-specific texts

نویسندگان

- -

Assistant Professor of TEFL, Department of English, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran

- -

Professor of TEFL, Department of English, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

- -

Lecturer in ELT, Department of English, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ackert, P., & Lee, L. (۲۰۰۵). Reading and vocabulary development ...
  • Ajideh, P., Mohammadbagheri, L., Bahrami, N., Saeidi, S., Babaei, H., ...
  • Anthony, L. (۲۰۱۸). Introducing English for specific purposes. Routledge ...
  • Askari Arani, J. (۲۰۰۵). Issues of learning EMP at university: ...
  • Atai, M. R. (۲۰۰۵, June ۹). Revisiting ESAP methodology in ...
  • Atai, M. R., & Tahririan, M. H. (۲۰۰۴). Assessment of ...
  • Behtary, S., & Davaribina, M. (۲۰۱۱) Prerequisite English course: Explorations ...
  • Brown, H. D. (۲۰۱۴). Principles of language learning and teaching: ...
  • Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (۲۰۱۵). Teaching by principles: ...
  • Chostelidou, D. (۲۰۱۰). A needs analysis approach to ESP syllabus ...
  • Deedari, R., & Ziahosseini, M. (۱۹۸۹). English for the students ...
  • Dornyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (۲۰۱۱). Teaching and researching motivation. ...
  • Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (۲۰۰۳). Teaching reading strategies and ...
  • Evans, S., & Green, C. (۲۰۰۷). Why EAP is necessary: ...
  • Farhady, H. (۲۰۰۶). On the specificity of purpose in ESP. ...
  • Gillet, A., & Wray, L. (۲۰۰۶). EAP and success. In ...
  • Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (۱۹۸۷). English for specific purposes: ...
  • Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (K.) (۲۰۲۱a). A bibliometric study ...
  • Mohammadi, S. M., & Safayee Moghadam, A. (۲۰۱۵). A comparative ...
  • Sakai, H., & Kikuchi, K. (۲۰۰۹). An analysis of demotivators ...
  • Taillefer, G. F. (۲۰۰۷). The professional language needs of Economics ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع