A Comparative Analysis of WinSRFR and SIRMOD Software for Simulating Surge and Alternate Furrow Irrigation Performance in Maize Fields
محل انتشار: فصلنامه علوم و مهندسی آبیاری، دوره: 47، شماره: 4
سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: فارسی
مشاهده: 253
فایل این مقاله در 15 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JISE-47-4_001
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 27 فروردین 1404
چکیده مقاله:
In order to compare of WinSRFR and SIRMOD software in simulating furrow irrigation performance, a field experiment was carried out in the Jayedar Plain. Five different furrow irrigation methods including conventional furrow irrigation (CFI), surge irrigation with on/off cycle ratios of ۱ and ۰.۵ (SFI۱-۱ and SFI۱-۲, respectively), fixed alternate irrigation (FFI) and variable alternate irrigation (AFI) were investigated. A total of ۱۵ irrigation evaluations were performed at the initial, middle, and end of the growing season by measuring inflow rate, cutoff time, outflow rate, infiltration and advance time. The length and spacing of experimental furrows were ۱۲۰ and ۰.۷۵ m and the inflow and cutoff times at the initial (۳rd irrigation), middle (۶th irrigation), and end (۹th irrigation) were ۰.۲۸ L/s and ۲۴۰ min, ۰.۴۲ L/s and ۳۶۰ min, ۰.۳۵ L/s and ۳۰۰ min, respectively. The WinSRFR ۳.۱ and SIRMOD software were calibrated, assessed, and compared using field measurements based on the zero-inertia model. WinSRFR and SIRMOD softwares demonstrated a strong correlation between the measured and simulated values of runoff, infiltration and advance time (coefficient of determination of (۰.۹۹۸۴, ۰.۹۹۷۶), (۰.۹۹۰۸, ۰.۹۹۳۲ ) and (۰.۹۴۴۹, ۰.۹۳۳۱), respectively. The relative error values of WinSRFR and SIRMOD Software in estimating runoff, infiltration and advance time were (۲.۹۶, ۳.۱۵), (۳.۰۳, ۳.۳۰), (۲.۰۹, ۲.۴۶) respectively. Both software overestimates the runoff (λ=۱.۰۲۹۶ in WinSRFR and λ= ۱.۰۳۱۵ in SIRMOD) and the advance time (λ=۱.۰۲۰۹ in WinSRFR and λ= ۱.۰۲۴۶ in SIRMOD). The WinSRFR software underestimates infiltration (λ=۰.۹۶۹۷) but SIRMOD software overestimates infiltration (λ=۱.۰۳۳۳). The results of this study show that AFI is a more suitable method for maize irrigation in the study area. The WinSRFR software has an advantage over the SIRMOD software in simulating furrow irrigation performance due to its higher ability and the use of a wide range of input parameters.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Akbar Mehri
PhD Student, Irrigation and Drainage Department, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.
Amir Soltani Mohammadi
Professor Irrigation and Drainage Department, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.Iran.
Hamed Ebrahimian
Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran.
Saeed Boroomand Nasab
Professor Irrigation and Drainage Department, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.