Authorial and Gender Identity in Published Research Articles and Students’ Academic Writing in Applied Linguistics

This study explores how professional and student writers manifest their authorial identities and project their gender voices in their academic texts. To this end, ۳۸ male-authored and ۳۸ female-authored articles published in seven leading international journals were selected. Moreover, ۳۸ articles written by male students and ۳۸ articles authored by female students were collected from two universities in Iran. Taking an academic writing course, these students handed in their papers as term projects. These academic writings were analyzed based on Hyland’s metadiscourse framework comprising two major resources: interactional and interactive metadiscourse resources. The findings indicated the male authors mainly attended to discourse organization using more interactive resources while the female authors mostly solicited solidarity by employing more interactional resources. The professional authors engaged in a more critical stance using self-mentions and attitude markers and the students focused on discourse organization. Attitude markers and self-mentions, as markers of stance-taking, were absent in the students’ writing. The professional authors made use of their gender identity to promote their authorial identity instead of suppressing it. These results suggest that EAP programs should inform students how to employ both metadiscourse resources and their gender-based discourse choices to express their authorial identity more effectively.

کلیدواژه ها:

Gender voice ، authorial identity ، interactive metadiscourse ، interactional metadiscourse ، stance-taking