Review on the Salaman and Absal commentaries of Hunayn ibn Isha

Salaman and Absal is a symbolic story that is reputed with several narrating. The reason ofvogue the different narratives of this story is the critical of Fakhr Razi on the expression ofSheikh Al-Rayis Abu Ali Sina has been entered in Al-Isharat Namat nine. The criticism isbusied the mind of Khaje Nasir Toosi and compeled him to searching the narrative and otherauthors now have been expressed the various perspectives about different narratives ofSalamn and Aabsal and and description of its codes from Khaje Nasir up to now. All of theseworks are founded upon Khaje Nasir comment that is achieved to two narratives of Salamanand Absal after several years of searching. One of the two narratives is the story that HunaynIbn Ishaq had been translated from Greek into Arbic a century ago but Khaje Nasir that hasbeen interpreted symbols of both stories with philosophical manner, doesn’t know theHunayn ibn Ishaq narrative accepted on Ibn Sina. In this paper we want to cash the Salamanand Absal commentaries of Hunayn ibn Ishaq according to Arabic text of Al-Isharat , Al-Tanbihat" Namat nine and show contrary to the belief that is affected on to Khaje Nasircomment since the seventh century AD, the accepted Salaman and Aabsal of Ibn Sina isHunayn Ibn Ishaq narrative and perhaps in compared with other commentaries that is writtenon this story, Sheikh Al- Rayis remarks in Al-Isharat Namat nine is the best mysticalinterpretation of this story.