Sub Basin Water Allocation Modeling Using System Dynamic Modeling and WEAP Model: A Case Study

سال انتشار: 1390
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 1,329

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

NCHP03_130

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 3 فروردین 1391

چکیده مقاله:

The allocation of limited water resources, environmental quality and sustainable water use policies are major issues causing growing concern around the world. The inherent and growing complexities of water resource systems: the challenges of water allocation and the frequent necessity to change input data have led to the development of a system of dynamic modeling for comprehensive water resource management. The subject matter of this paper is the application of a system of dynamic modeling for the Gorganrud River Basin. Considering the need for a Decision Support System (DSS) model that considers all factors, running time was also an important consideration for the decision markers, therefore, the water resources and demands simulation model of Gorganrud basin used VENSIM software and output results were calibrated by the well-known water resources planning model WEAP. A comparison of VENSIM and WEAP shows a high level of accuracy, with matching results between the two models. The outputs of the two models were very similar with the difference being that the running time for the WEAP model was longer than for the VENSIM model in a specific scenario with the same computer model (it was more than 10 times). This developed model on VENSIM environment could save computing time and reduce the decision making time for more efficient management. This technique for the development of a model provides the possibility of adding other qualitative models. The temporal distribution of outflow to the sea show that the two models matched completely. Average annual outflow to the sea in the VENSIM model was 276 million cubic per meter (MCM) and on WEAP model was 275 MCM which is less than 0.4 percent difference.

نویسندگان

s Ehsan Fatemi

PhD student, Environmental civil Engineering, KNToosi University of Technology & Mahabghodss co

f Vafaie

Assistant professor, Environmental civil Engineering, K.N.Toosi University of Technology,

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmad, S., and Simonovic, S. P. (2000). "System dynamics modeling ...
  • Arthington AH. 1998a. Comparative Evaluation of Environmenta Flow Assessment Techniques: ...
  • Arthington AH. 1998b. Brisbane River trial of a Flow Restoration ...
  • Arthington AH, Zalucki JM (eds). 1998a. Comparative Evaluation of Environmenta ...
  • Arthington AH, Zalucki JM (eds). 1998b. Water for the Environment ...
  • Cai, X., McKinney, D. C.. and Lasdon, L. S (2003). ...
  • Cavendish MG, Duncan MI. 1986. Use of the instream flow ...
  • Dunbar MJ, Gustard A, Acreman MC, Elliott CRN. 1998. Review ...
  • GUNHUI CHUNG, PHD thesis (2007). "Water supply system management and ...
  • Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL. 1992. Stream Hydrology. An ...
  • Jowett IG. 1997. Instream flow methods: a comparison of approaches. ...
  • Kinhill Engineers. 1988. Techniques for Determining Environmentl Water R equirements-a ...
  • King JM, Tharme RE, Brown CA. 1999. Definition and Implementation ...
  • Loucks, D. P. (1995). "Developing and implementing decision support systems: ...
  • Milhous RT, Updike MA, Schneider D, 1989. Physical Habitat Simulation ...
  • Morhardt JE. 1986. Instream Flow Methodologies. EA-4819 Research Project 2194-2. ...
  • Ocanas, G. and Mays, L. W. (1981b), :Water reuse planning ...
  • O Shea DT. 1995. Estimating minimum instream flow requirements for ...
  • Palmer, R. N., Wright, J. R., Smith, J. A., Cohon, ...
  • Rosenberg DM, McCully P, Pringle CM. 2000. Global-scale environment effects ...
  • new modeling approach for water resources policy analysis.:" Water A:ه ...
  • Smakhtin VU 2001. Low flow hydrology: a review. Journal of ...
  • Stalnaker CB, Arnette SC. 1976. Methodologies for the Determination of ...
  • Stewardson M, Gippel C. 1997. In-stream Environmentl Flow Design: A ...
  • Swales S, Harris JH. 1995. The expert panel assessment method ...
  • Tharme RE. 1996. Review of Internationl Methodologies for the Quantification ...
  • Tharme RE. 1997. Review of IFR methodologies. In Task _ ...
  • Tharme RE. 2000. An overview of environmental flow methodologies, with ...
  • US Army Corps of Engineers (2003). HEC-ResSim User s Manual, ...
  • Yen, K. H., and Chen, C. Y. (2001). ":Allocation strategy ...
  • Wesche TA, Rechard PA. 1980. A Summary of Instream Flow ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع