Optimum Ranking of Hydropower Projects: Comparison of TOPSIS, ELECTEREIII and SAW Methods

سال انتشار: 1390
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 1,415

فایل این مقاله در 13 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

NCHP03_111

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 3 فروردین 1391

چکیده مقاله:

A water resource system is a collection of different elements that connect together to meet different demands logically. Water resource management usually needs complex decision making. Despite of the classical optimization models based on optimizing a goal, usually optimizing multiple objectives or criteria for obtaining the best decision is required. Multi-criteria decision making methods (MCDM) actuallyincludes different approaches to help decision makers to reach judgments and choices are reasonable. In Multi-criteria decision making problems, method of decision making is very impressive, in addition of comments of decision makers. This research illustrates the results of ELECTEREIII, SAW and TOPSIS methods that has been compared with each other. A system of multiple reservoirs and power plants is examined in several and different combinations (via single, two and three reservoir and power plant systems) as alternatives. In each of these three systems, different options are discussed. In this research, 48 alternatives are designed that 12 alternatives are single dam system, 26 and 10 are double and three dams system. Differences of alternatives are related to combination of dams, discharge of transferred water and hydropower production. The criteria of this decision making problem are firm energy, secondary energy, volume of water to be transferred, total cost, occupations to be created, security of dams, rehabilitation, regional development and system beauty. Finally, Sensitivity analysis was performed and the results arepresented.

کلیدواژه ها:

TOPSIS ، SAW ، ELECTREIII ، Multi Criteria Decision Making

نویسندگان

Hajar Nikghalb Ashouri

Water Resources Expert, Zistab Consulting Engineering, Tehran, Iran

Saeed Alimohammadi

Assistant professor, Power and Water University of Technology

Hamid Mosahebi Mohammadi

Head of Water Resources planning & management, Jamab Consulting Engineering, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Benayoun, R., De Montgolfier, J., Tergny, J., and Larichev, O. ...
  • Bose, D. and Bose, B. (1995) Evaluation of Alternatives for ...
  • Duckstein, L., and Opricovic, S. (1980) Multi Objective Optimization in ...
  • El Magnouni, S., and Treichel, W. (1994) A Multi Criterion ...
  • Gershon, _ Duckstein, L., and McAniff, R. (1982) Multiobjective River ...
  • Hobbs, B.F., Chankong V., Hamadeh, W. and Stakhiv, E.Z. (1992) ...
  • Jabbarri, E., and Alimohammad , S. Ranking the Water Resources ...
  • M.J. Asgharpour, "Muliple Criteria Decision Making", University of Tehran press-Iran, ...
  • Roy, B., (1985) Methodologie Multicritere d' Aide la Decision, Economica, ...
  • Roy, B., Slowinski, R., and Treichel, W. (1992) Multi Criteria ...
  • Shafike N.G., Duckstein L., and Maddock III, T. (1992) Multicriterion ...
  • Tecle, A., and Duckstein, L. (1992) Concepts of Multicriterion Decision ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع