Effects of Different Response Types on Iranian EFL Test Takers’ Performance

سال انتشار: 1392
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 294

فایل این مقاله در 22 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJALS-5-2_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 خرداد 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Test method facet is one of the factors which can have an influence on the test takers’ performance. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effects of two different response types, multiple-choice cloze and multiple-choice test, on the pre-intermediate and intermediate test takers’ reading comprehension performance. To this end, ۴۰ pre-intermediate and intermediate learners participated in the study. To counterbalance the practice effect, the participants of the study at both pre-intermediate and intermediate levels were randomly assigned into two groups. For each level, there were two types of tests and two test administrations. Within each level, the two groups took these two tests in a different order. For all participants of the study there were two scores based on multiple- choice cloze and multiple-choice tests. Two Paired sample t tests were separately run to compare the pre-intermediate and intermediate test takers’ performance on multiple-choice cloze and multiple-choice tests. Two independent samples t tests were run to compare the pre-intermediate and intermediate test takers on these two tests. There was no significant difference between the pre-intermediate test takers’ performance on these two types of tests. There was a significant difference between intermediate test takers’ performance on the tests. There was no significant difference between the pre-intermediate and intermediate test takers’ performance on the multiple-choice cloze tests. The intermediate test takers outperformed the pre-intermediate test takers only on the multiple-choice tests. Based on these results it can be concluded that test methods can have an influence on the test takers’ performance, especially at higher proficiency levels and learners may need to have reached a certain level of proficiency to be able to understand the text.

نویسندگان

Mohammad Hassan Chehrazad

University of Tabriz

Parviz Ajideh

University of Tabriz

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Alderson, J. C. (۲۰۰۰). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ...
  • Bachman, L. (۱۹۹۰). Fundamental considerations in language testing. London: OUP ...
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (۱۹۸۱).The construct validation ...
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (۱۹۸۲). The construct ...
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (۱۹۹۶).Language testing in ...
  • Buck, G. (۱۹۹۰). Testing second language listening comprehension. Unpublished doctoral ...
  • Buck, G. (۱۹۹۱). The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective ...
  • Buck, G. (۲۰۰۱). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ...
  • Clapham, C. (۱۹۹۶).The development of IELTS: A study of the ...
  • In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (۲۰۰۹). A meta-analysis of test ...
  • Jafarpur, A. (۲۰۰۳). Is the test constructor a facet? Language ...
  • Kintsch, W. & Yarbrough, J. C. (۱۹۸۲). Role of rhetorical ...
  • Kobayashi, M. (۲۰۰۲). Method effects on reading comprehension test performance: ...
  • Lumley, T., & O’Sullivan, B. (۲۰۰۵). The effect of test-taker ...
  • Ridgway, T. (۱۹۹۷). Thresholds of the background knowledge effect in ...
  • Shohamy, E. (۱۹۸۳). The stability of oral proficiency assessment on ...
  • Shohamy, E. (۱۹۸۴). Does the testing method make a difference? ...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (۱۹۶۹). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع