Is the Pushed Output-Based Instruction Effective in Promoting Iranian EFL Learners Grammatical Accuracy in Writing?

سال انتشار: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 247

فایل این مقاله در 24 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJALS-12-1_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 خرداد 1400

چکیده مقاله:

In an attempt to contribute to the ongoing debate about how output tasks affect noticing of linguistic forms, the present study set out to investigate the effect of pushed output tasks on grammatical accuracy in sentence writing of Iranian EFL learners. Fifty homogenous Iranian EFL learners were randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups. Then, every group underwent ten different treatment sessions. The control group received writing instruction through conventional methods, while the experimental group received instruction through two pushed output tasks. In the case of the experimental group, in the first five treatment sessions, four grammatical structures were presented through picture cued tasks. The next five treatment sessions directed at other structures took place via reconstruction tasks. Two different versions of the writing section of the Preliminary English Test (PET) were used as pre/post-test. The results indicated that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group. Therefore, it might be argued that pushed output-based tasks had a positive effect on the Iranian EFL learner’s grammatical accuracy in sentence writing. These findings provide empirical support for the output hypothesis and have pedagogical implications for the choice of output-oriented grammar tasks.

نویسندگان

Simin Anbarshahi

English Language Department, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

Lida Sharafati

Payame Noor University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz- Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Birjandi, P., & Malmir, A. (۲۰۰۹). The effect of task-based ...
  • Birjandi, P., & Mamaghani, H. J. (۲۰۱۴). The impact of ...
  • Brown, H. D. (۲۰۰۴). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices.: ...
  • Campillo, P. (۲۰۰۶). Focus on form tasks and the provision ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۱). Introduction: Investigating form‐focused instruction. Language Learning, ۵۱(۱), ۱-۴۶ ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۸). Explicit form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. In ...
  • Esmaieelzade, V. (۲۰۱۴). The effect of text reconstruction on grammar ...
  • Fotos, S. S. (۱۹۹۳). Consciousness raising and noticing through focus ...
  • Fortune, A. (۲۰۰۵). Learners’ use of metalanguage in collaborative form-focused ...
  • Gass, S. M. (۲۰۰۳). Input and interaction. In C. J. ...
  • Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L. (۱۹۹۴). Second language acquisition: ...
  • Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (۲۰۰۱) Second edition second ...
  • Hawkes, M. L. (۲۰۱۲). Using task repetition to direct learner ...
  • Izumi, S., & Lakshmanan, U. (۱۹۹۸). Learnability, negative evidence and ...
  • Izumi, S. (۲۰۰۳). Comprehension and production processes in second language ...
  • Izumi, Y., & Izumi, S. (۲۰۰۴). Investigating the effects of ...
  • Kim, E. C. (۲۰۱۰). Textual input enhancement: Applications in teaching. ORTESOL ...
  • Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (۱۹۹۴). Using collaborative language production ...
  • Kim, Y., Choi, B., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, ...
  • Long, M. (۱۹۹۱). Focus on Form: A design feature in ...
  • Long, M., & Robinson, P. (۱۹۹۸). Focus on form: Theory, ...
  • Leeser, M. J. (۲۰۰۸). Pushed output, noticing, and development of ...
  • Lozano, M. B., Mayo, M. D. P. G., & Leeser, ...
  • Lyster, R. (۱۹۹۸). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction ...
  • Lyster, R. (۲۰۰۴). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in ...
  • Mackey, A. (۱۹۹۹). Input, interaction, and second language development: An ...
  • Mayo, M. G. (۲۰۱۳). Collaborative tasks and their potential for ...
  • Nahavandi, N., & Mukundan, J. (۲۰۱۳). The impact of textual ...
  • Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (۱۹۹۳). Focused communication tasks and ...
  • Pawlak, M. (۲۰۱۱). Text reconstruction activities and teaching language forms. ...
  • Reinders, H. (۲۰۰۹). Learner uptake and acquisition in three grammar-oriented ...
  • Rezvani, E. (۲۰۱۱). The effect of output requirement on the ...
  • Rutherford, W. (۱۹۸۷). Second language grammar: Learning and teaching. Longman ...
  • Schmidt, R. (۱۹۹۴). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of ...
  • Schmidt, R. (۲۰۰۱). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and ...
  • Selinker, L. (۱۹۷۲). Interlanguage. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language ...
  • Shin, S. Y., Lidster, R., Sabraw, S., & Yeager, R. ...
  • Skehan, P. (۲۰۰۳). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, ۳۶, ۱-۱۴ ...
  • Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (۱۹۹۹). Instruction, first language ...
  • Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (۲۰۰۸). Form‐focused instruction: Isolated ...
  • Sheen, Y. (۲۰۰۸). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L۲ ...
  • Song, M. J., & Suh, B. R. (۲۰۰۸). The effects ...
  • Sitthitikul, P. (۲۰۱۷). The roles of output in second language ...
  • Swain, M. (۱۹۹۵). Three functions of output in second language ...
  • Swain, M. (۱۹۹۸). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In ...
  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (۱۹۹۵). Problems in output and ...
  • Tomita, Y., & Spada, N. (۲۰۱۳). Form-focused instruction and learner ...
  • Thornbury, S. (۱۹۹۷). About language: Tasks for teachers of English. Ernst ...
  • Zoghi, M., & Hasannejad, M. R. (۲۰۱۵). A comparative study ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع