Word clustering effect on vocabulary learning of EFL learners: A case of semantic versus phonological clustering

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 174

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-36-4_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Research on word clustering effect has been a critical issue in vocabulary studies and has generated controversial results. To remove this controversy, the aim of this study is to probe into the effect of word clustering method on vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners through semantic versus phonological clustering. To this effect, ۸۰ homogeneous students from four intermediate classes at an English institute in Torbat‑e‑Heydariyeh participated in this research. They were assigned to four groups according to semantic versus phonological clustering (± semantic, ± phonological); then, based on each group's clustering pattern, ۱۰ selected words were taught. At the end of the treatment phase, immediate and delayed posttests of vocabulary were given to the students in a multiple-choice format to investigate the effects of word clustering in short and long-term vocabulary learning. The analysis of the data was done in SPSS through a one-way ANOVA. The results in both immediate and delayed post-tests showed a statistically significant difference among groups. The obtained mean scores revealed the following rank order of mean performance in both immediate and delayed post-tests :(+ semantic, + phonological), (+ semantic, - phonological), (- semantic, + phonological), and (- semantic, - phonological). This finding revealed that semantic and phonological clustering were effective methods of grouping new vocabulary. These findings and relevant implications are discussed in the paper.

نویسندگان

Seyyed Mohammad Reza Amirian

Hakim Sabzevari Universiry

Mortaza Bonjakhi

Hakim Sabzevari University

Golnaz Sabbaghzadeh

Islamic Azad University, Neyshabour Branch

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmadi, A., Darabi Bazvand, A., Sahragard, R., & Razmjoo, A. ...
  • Alavi, T. (2012). The Predictive Validity of Final English Exams ...
  • Alderson, J. C. (1991): Language testing in the 1990s: How ...
  • Alibakhshi, G., & Ali, H. G. (2011). External Validity of ...
  • Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford ...
  • Bachman. L. F. (2005). Building and supporting a case for ...
  • Bachman, L. F. &Palmer. A. S. (1981a). The construct validation ...
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (1982). The construct validation ...
  • Bachman, L. F., Davidson, F., Ryan, K., & Choi, I.-C. ...
  • Bae, J., & Bachman, L. F. (1998). A latent variable ...
  • Gender-based DIF across the Subject Area: A Study of the Iranian National University Entrance Exam [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Barati, H., Ketabi, S., & Ahmadi, A. (2006). Differential item ...
  • Barbour, R. P. (1983). An exploratory study of the hypothesis of ...
  • Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on ...
  • Bennett, R. E. (2010). Cognitively based assessment of, for, and ...
  • Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to ...
  • Birjandi, P., & Amini, M. (2007). Differential item functioning (test ...
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of ...
  • Byrne, B.M. (1989): A primer of LISREL: essential applications and ...
  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and ...
  • Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, ...
  • Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative ...
  • Carroll, J. B. (1983). Psychometric theory and language testing. Issues in ...
  • Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. ...
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit ...
  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & ...
  • Farhady, H. (1983). On the plausibility of the unitary language ...
  • Farhady, H., & Abbassian, G. R. (2000). The test method, ...
  • Farnsworth, T. L. (2013). An investigation into the validity of ...
  • Fouly, K. A., Bachman, L. F., & Cziko, G. A. ...
  • Garrido, L. E., Abad, F. J., & Ponsoda, V. (2012). ...
  • Ginther, A., & Stevens, J. (1995). Language Background, Ethnicity, and ...
  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the ...
  • Horn, J. L., McArdle, J. J., & Mason, R. (1983). ...
  • Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and ...
  • Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for ...
  •             Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, ...
  • In'nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2011). Factor structure of the ...
  • Jamalifar, G., Tabrizi, H. H., & Chalak, A. (2014). Islamic ...
  • Jiao, H. (2004). Evaluating the dimensionality of the Michigan English ...
  • Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to ...
  • Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological ...
  • Kline, R. B. (1989). Principles and practice of structural equation ...
  • Kunnan, A. J. (1992). An investigation of a criterion-referenced test ...
  • Mahmoudi, L., & Bakar, K. A. (2013). Iranian Pre-university English ...
  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), ...
  • Mesick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational ...
  • Messick, S. (1995). The validity of psychological assessment: Validation of ...
  • Oller, J. W., Jr. (1978). The language factor in the ...
  • Oller, J. W. (1979). Language tests at school: A pragmatic ...
  • Oller, J. W., & Hinofotis, F. A. (1980). Two mutually ...
  • Ravand, H., & Firoozi, T. (2016). Investigating Validity of UEE ...
  • Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications ...
  • Römhild, A. (2008). Investigating the invariance of the ECPE factor ...
  • Saito, Y. (2003). Investigating the construct validity of the cloze ...
  • Salehi, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2012). The washback effect ...
  • Shin, S. K. (2005). Did they take the same test? ...
  • Sasaki, M. (1996). Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and ...
  • Sawaki, Y., Stricker, L. J., & Oranje, A. H. (2009). ...
  • Song, M. Y. (2008). Do distinct subskills exist in second ...
  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically based ...
  • Stricker, L. J., & Rock, D. A. (2008). Factor Structure ...
  • Stricker, L. J., Rock, D. A., & Lee, Y. W. ...
  • Swinton, S. S., & Powers, D. E. (1980). Factor analysis ...
  • Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. ...
  • Velicer, W. F., Eaton, C. A., & Fava, J. L. ...
  • Vollmer, H. J. (1983). The structure of foreign language competence. Current ...
  • Wagner, E. (2004). A construct validation study of the extended ...
  • Wang, S. (2006). Validation and Invariance of Factor Structure of ...
  • Yuan, K. H. (2005). Fit indices versus test statistics. Multivariate ...
  • Zhang, B. (2010). Assessing the accuracy and consistency of language ...
  • Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع