Developing EFL Learners' Oral Proficiency through Animation-based Instruction of English Formulaic Sequences

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 250

فایل این مقاله در 34 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-38-1_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 بهمن 1399

چکیده مقاله:

The current pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study attempts, firstly, to probe the effects of teaching formulaic sequences (FSs) on the second or foreign language (L2)  learners' oral proficiency improvement and secondly, to examine whether teaching FSs through different resources (i.e. animation vs. text-based readings) have any differentially influential effects in augmenting L2  learners' oral proficiency or not. To this end, a cohort of 60 young L2 learners of an immersion program school in the southwest of Iran was randomly divided into three groups, two experimental and one control. During 24 instructional sessions, one experimental group received the FSs instruction through animation, and the second experimental group noticed FSs through text-based readings.  The control group was taught using the school mainstream L2 textbooks without any focus on FSs. The results indicated that both FSs groups outperformed the control group. Moreover, animation-based instruction significantly increased the efficacy of FSs instruction, pointing to the issue that educational technology is a better strategy for teaching FSs rather than the traditional way of reading.

نویسندگان

Maryam Rajaei Najafabadi

Chabahar Maritime University

Yousef Bakhshizadeh

Chabahar Maritime University

Azizullah Mirzaei

Shahrekord University

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • AlHassan, L., & Wood, D. (2015). The effectiveness of focused ...
  • Appel, R., & Wood, D. (2016). Recurrent word combinations in ...
  • Alsagoff, L. (2018). Describing Proficiency. In John I. Liontas (Ed.), ...
  • Bakhshizadeh, Y., Rahimi Domakani, M., & Rajaei, M. (2015). The ...
  • Bisson, M.-J., van Heuven, W. J. B., Conklin, K., & ...
  • Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, ...
  • Chan, T. P., & Liou, H. C. (2005). Effects of ...
  • Doughty, C & Williams, J (1998). Focus on form in ...
  • Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: ...
  • Ellis, N. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and ...
  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: ...
  • Hall, I. & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions ...
  • Huemer, S., Landerl, K., Aron, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2008). ...
  • Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (2000.) Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven ...
  • Jones, M., & Haywood, S. (2004). Facilitating the acquisition of ...
  • Karemaker, A., Pitchford, N. J. & O’Malley, C. (2010). Enhanced ...
  • Keller, R. (1979). Gambits: Conversational strategy signals. Journal of Pragmatics, ...
  • Kuiper, K. (2009). Formulaic genres. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan. ...
  • Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT ...
  • Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into ...
  • Lewis, M. (2000). Learning in the lexical approach. In M. ...
  • Lynch, T. (2001). Seeing what they mean: Transcribing as a ...
  • Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner ...
  • McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford University Press. ...
  • Lexis-Based Instruction and IELTS Candidates’ Development of L۲ Speaking Ability: Use of Formulaicity in Monologic Versus Dialogic Task [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Moudraia, O. (2001). Lexical approach to second language teaching. Eric ...
  • Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases ...
  • O'Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus ...
  • Omaggio, A. C. (1986). Methodology in transition: The new focus ...
  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford, England: ...
  • Palmér, A. (2010). Muntligt i klassrummet- om tal, samtal och ...
  • Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for ...
  • Perera, N.S. (2001). The role of prefabricated language in young ...
  • Rieber, L. P. (1989). A Review of Animation research in ...
  • Rieber, L. P. (1990). Effects of animated visuals on incidental ...
  • Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & ...
  • Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & ...
  • Schmitt, N. (2004). (Ed.). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use. ...
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of consciousness in second language ...
  • Schmidt, R. (2010). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language ...
  • Schmidt, R., Boraie, D., & Kassabgy, O. (1996). Foreign language ...
  • Serrano, R., Stengers, H., & Housen, A. (2015). Acquisition of ...
  • Singh, S. (2015). Self-assessment of oral proficiency among ESL learners. ...
  • Sundberg, P. (1998). Animation in CALL: Learning to think in ...
  • Taguchi, N. (2008). Building language blocks in L2 Japanese: Chunk ...
  • Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic ...
  • Vihman, M. M. (1982). Formulas in first and second language ...
  • Walker-Tileston, D., 2004. What every teacher should know about media ...
  • Wong-Fillmore, L. (1976). The second time around: Cognitive and social ...
  • Wood, D. (2007). Measuring the link between formulaic sequences and ...
  • Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: ...
  • Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, England: ...
  • Wray, A., & Fitzpatrick, T. (2008). Why can’t you just ...
  • Yoffe, L. (1997). An overview of ACTFL proficiency interviews: A ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع