Interlanguage Pragmatics Development: Iranian EFL Learners’ Interpretation and Use of Speech Acts

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 438

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELLTE02_058

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 آذر 1395

چکیده مقاله:

Aim of this article is to investigate the Iranian EFL learners' interpretation and use of speech acts as a feature of their interlanguage pragmatic knowledge. This article answers two essential questions ١) Is there any role of formal instruction of pragmatic knowledge in the enhancement of Iranian pre Intermediate L٢ learners' interpretation of speech. ٢)Is there any role of formal Instruction in the enhancement of Iranian intermediate L٢ learners’ use of speech acts. For this purpose ٦٠ Iranian intermediate EFL learners were selected In ACCER Institute through a replacement test, two researcher tests of speech acts were used as pre-test before the speech acts were introduced. These Instructions were held for ten sessions. Two posttests of speech acts were then administered and the data were analyzed through calculating ANCOVAs for the pretest and the posttest scores of each participant group independently. The results showed that pre-intermediate Iranian EFL learners indicated a higher progress in the interpretation but there was no significant change in the usage of the speech acts from the conduction of pretest to the posttest of the study.

نویسندگان

Saeedeh Ghasemi

Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch-IRAN.

Anita Lashkarian

Islamic Azad University, Yazd Branch-IRAN

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Braidi, S.1995. Reconsidering the role of interaction and input in ...
  • Ahn, R. C. 2005. Five measures of interlanguage pragmatics in ...
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K.1999. Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research ...
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Hartford, B.1993. Learning the rules of academic ...
  • Bardovi-Harlig, _ and Hartford, _ 1996. Input in an institutionl ...
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Hartford, _ 2005. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Exploring Institutional ...
  • Barron, A. 2003. Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics. Learning How to ...
  • Bialystok, E. 1 978. A theoretical model of second language ...
  • Bialystok, E. 1982. Om the relationship between knowing and using ...
  • Bialystok, E.1993. Symbolic representation and attentionl control in pragmatic competence. ...
  • Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Gabrielle Kasper (Eds.). 1989. Cross-culturat ...
  • Brown, J. D. 2001. Pragmatics tests: Different PurPOS4S, different test, ...
  • Carrol, S. 1999. Putting input' in its proper place. Second ...
  • Carroll, S. 2001. Input and Evidenc. The Raw Materil of ...
  • Cohen, A. D. 2004. The interface between interlanguage pragmatics and ...
  • Cohen, A. D. 2008. Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics: What ...
  • De Paiva, B. 2006. Requests in Brazilian Portuguese: New theoretical ...
  • S. 1999. Evaluating six measures of EL ...
  • Faerch, _ and Kasper, G.1985. Pragmatic knowledge: Rules and procedures. ...
  • House, J. and Kasper, G. 1981. Politeness markers in English ...
  • Hymes, D. 1972. Om communicative competence. In: Pride J. B. ...
  • Hudson, T., Detmer, E. and Brown, J. D. 1995. Developing ...
  • Kasper, G.1989. Variation in interlanguage speech act realizatio. In: Gass, ...
  • Kasper, G. 2001. Four perspectives o L2 pragmatic development. Applied ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع