Strategies of Corrective Feedback via Email in Improving Iranian Students’ Writing Accuracy

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 525

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF03_240

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 اردیبهشت 1395

چکیده مقاله:

The role of feedback has always been of importance in scientific debates. Corrective feedback in learning is of higher importance. There are different strategies of providing corrective feedback which are the aims of this current study. In addition, student writing in different contexts of ESL/EFL is of significance, too. The study attempted to investigate the provision of corrective feedback on student writing via new mediums of communication as Email and Microsoft Word software. 84 Iranian EFL students of higher intermediate levels took part in 4 groups of indirect feedback (IF), direct feedback (DF), indirect followed by direct with explicit corrective comments (IDECC), and no feedback (NF). Such groups were examined with respect to the impact of feedback each group received. Findings of this study are in support of the effectiveness of corrective feedback in student writing. According to the findings, all three treatment groups after two stages of revisions outperformed the control group. Among treatment groups, the IDECC which benefited the combination of other two strategies of providing feedback could gain the most effect in the new essay.

نویسندگان

Farid Mousavi Shakheh

Isfahan University

Ahmad Moinzadeh

Isfahan University

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on _ language learning potential ...
  • Ebadi, E. (2014). The Effect of Focused Meta-linguistic Written Corrective ...
  • Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, _ & Takashima, H. (2008). ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in ...
  • Guenette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues ...
  • Jokar, M., & Soyoof, A. (2014). The Influence of Written ...
  • Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of ...
  • Rahimi, M., & Asadi, E. (2014). Effect of Different Types ...
  • Rob, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of ...
  • Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign ...
  • Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a ...
  • Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع