On the Relationship between Students’ Language Learning Strategies and Their Level of Language Proficiency in University Context

سال انتشار: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 510

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF02_100

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 بهمن 1394

چکیده مقاله:

This study aimed at exploring the relationship between students’ level of language proficiency and their Language Learning Strategies used. A group of sixty five EFL learners (32 junior and 33 senior)were randomly selected from EFL students majoring in English translation and English literature at Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. All the participants were native speakers of Persian.To obtain the required data Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) developed by Oxford (1990)was used to determine the type of Language Learning Strategies that participants used. The results of the study showed that there were not any significant differences between junior and senior EFL learners regarding Language Learning Strategies sub-parts namely:Memory, Cognitive, Compensation, Metacognitive, Affective, and Social learning strategies that they used. Also in order to answer the research question regarding the participants' Language Learning Strategies use based on the three levels (high/mid/low) in two groups of junior and senior students, for each strategy, a Chi-Square Test was launched to explore the differences among the groups. In this study, none of the groups yielded significant results. Meaning that difference in proficiency level, junior/senior, did not affect the levels of each strategy the participants used.

نویسندگان

Mina Rastegar

Ph.D TEFL,Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

Fatemeh Rezazadeh

M.A. TEFL,Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Akbari, R., , & Talebinezhad, M. R. (2003). The relationship ...
  • Brown, H. _ (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching ...
  • Chen, S. Q. (1990). A study of communic ation strategies ...
  • Ghavamnia, N., Kassaian, Z., & Dabaghi, A. (2011). The relationship ...
  • Ghorb andordinej ad, F. (2010). Language teaching methodology. Tehran, Iran: ...
  • Khabiri, M., & Azaminejad, M. (2009). The relationship between EFL ...
  • Nikoopour, J., & Amini Farsani, M. (2010). On the relationship ...
  • O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., S tewner-M anzanare _ ...
  • Oxford, R., & Ehrman, M. (1998). Psychological type and adult ...
  • Park, G. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in ...
  • Peacock, M., & Ho, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies ...
  • Rae L, L. (2005). Language learning strategies profiles of EFL ...
  • Salahshour, F., Sharifi, M., & Salahshour, N. (2012). The relationship ...
  • Zare, P. (2012). Language learning strategies among EFL/ESL learners: A ...
  • Never or almost never true of me (1) ...
  • Usually not true of me (2) ...
  • Somewhat true of me (3) 4. Usually true of me ...
  • Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) Developed By Oxford (1990) ...
  • Always or almost always true of me (5) ...
  • I use flashcards to remember new English words. ...
  • I physically act out new English words. ...
  • I review English lessons often. ...
  • I say or write new English words several times. ...
  • I try to talk like native English speakers. ...
  • I practice the sounds of English. ...
  • I use the English words I know in different ways. ...
  • I start conversations in English. ...
  • I read for pleasure in the English. ...
  • I write notes, messages, letters, or reports in English. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع