Gradational Epistemology in Qur’anic Perspective: A Ṣadrian Hermeneutical Model and Its Epistemological, Anthropological, and Cultural–Civilizational Implications

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 78

فایل این مقاله در 31 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JIQS-5-2_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مهر 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Within Islamic theology and Qur’anic exegesis, the levels of sensory, rational, and heart-based cognition have often been discussed through separate theological, philosophical, or exegetical approaches. As the foundations upon which individual and collective attitudes and decisions are formed, these levels exert a direct influence on political and economic orientations. Nevertheless, Western theories of civilization have largely concentrated on structural and historical factors and have devoted comparatively little attention to the role of levels of cognition in the dynamics of civilization. The absence of a model that explains these levels within a teleological and civilizational framework has created a significant gap in the existing literature. This study seeks to propose a Ṣadrian hermeneutical model that integrates Qur’anic epistemology with the principles of al-Ḥikmah al-Mutaʿāliyah, thereby reinterpreting the progression from sensory cognition to rational understanding and ultimately to heart-based cognition in relation to civilizational development. By a Ṣadrian hermeneutical model, the study refers to an interpretive framework grounded in al-Ḥikmah al-Mutaʿāliyah that explains the understanding of the Qur’anic text in relation to the existential and cognitive levels of the human being. This study presents the model through the lens of its epistemological, anthropological, and cultural-civilizational implications. Utilizing a descriptive-analytical methodology with a comparative approach, this research examines selected Qur’anic verses based on Mullā Ṣadrā’s doctrines of substantial motion (al-ḥarakah al-jawhariyyah), the gradation of Being (tashkīk al-wujūd), and the unity of the intellect and the intelligible (ittiḥād al-ʿāqil wa al-maʿqūl). Subsequently, a comparative analysis is offered alongside classical exegeses and Western civilizational models. The Qur’anic–Ṣadrian model regards sensory cognition as the indispensable yet inherently limited point of departure; it presents rational cognition as a bridge leading to presential knowledge; and it identifies heart-based cognition as the highest mode of cognition and the means through which individual spiritual refinement is linked to collective civilizational flourishing. By grounding the integration of sciences in existential unity and teleology, this framework provides an alternative to reductionist empiricist, rationalist, and utilitarian approaches, demonstrating that individual perceptual transcendence serves as a primary catalyst for civilizational progress within a Qur’anic horizon.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Mohsen Tavakkoli Varzaneh

Assistant Professor, Department of Qur'an and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Theology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Sayyed Mohammad ALi Mirdamadi

PhD in Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Al-Rāzī, F. M. (۱۹۹۹). Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār al-Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth ...
  • Al-Ṭabrisī, F. (۱۹۹۳). Majmaʿ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Tehran: Nāṣir Khusru ...
  • Al-Ṭūsī, M. (۲۰۰۲). Al-Tibyān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth ...
  • Alviri, M. (۲۰۱۵). The Civilizational Function of the Quran: A ...
  • Al-Zamakhsharī, M. (۱۹۸۶). Al-Kashshāf ʿan Ḥaqā’iq Ghawāmiḍ al-Tanzīl. Beirut: Dār ...
  • Aquinas, T. (۱۹۴۷). Summa Theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican ...
  • Bekemans, L. (۲۰۱۴). Intercultural dialogue and human rights. In From ...
  • Comte, A. (۱۸۵۵). The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte (H. ...
  • Descartes, R. (۲۰۰۸). Meditations on First Philosophy with Selections from ...
  • Gadamer, H. (۱۹۸۹). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. ...
  • Hume, D. (۲۰۰۰). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • Huntington, S. P. (۱۹۹۶). The clash of civilizations and the ...
  • Husserl, E. (۱۹۸۳). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological ...
  • Kant, I. (۲۰۱۲). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (M. ...
  • Klein, J. T. (۲۰۱۰). Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures: A model ...
  • Kosari, A. (۲۰۱۸). The role of Quran in shaping the ...
  • Kuhn, T. S. (۲۰۱۲). The structure of scientific revolutions (۴th ...
  • Locke, J. (۱۹۹۹). An essay concerning human understanding. Pennsylvania State ...
  • Makarem Shirazi, N. (۱۹۹۵). Tafsīr Nimūneh. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyyah ...
  • Mead, G. H. (۱۹۳۴). Mind, Self, and Society: From the ...
  • Mill, J. S. (۱۸۴۳). A system of logic, ratiocinative and ...
  • Motahari, M. (۱۹۹۱). Collected works. Tehran: Ṣadrā ...
  • Nasr, S. H. (۱۹۹۶). Religion and the order of nature. ...
  • Qarai, A. Q. (۲۰۰۴). Translation of the Holy Qur’an. London: ICAS ...
  • Rawls, J. (۱۹۹۳). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press ...
  • Repko, A. F., & Szostak, R. (۲۰۲۰). Interdisciplinary research: Process ...
  • Ricoeur, P. (۱۹۸۱). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on ...
  • Rousseau, J.-J. (۲۰۱۱). The Social Contract (C. Betts, Trans.). Oxford: ...
  • Ṣadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī, M. (۱۹۸۱). Al-Ḥikmah al-Mutaʿāliyah fī al-Asfār al-ʿAqliyyah al-Arbaʿah. ...
  • Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī, M. (۲۰۰۴). Al-Shawāhid al-rubūbiyyah fī al-manāhij al-sulūkiyyah. ...
  • Sartre, J.-P. (۱۹۹۲). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological ...
  • Spengler, O. (۲۰۰۶). The decline of the West (C. F. ...
  • Tabataba'i, M. H. (۱۹۹۶). Al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān. Qom: Jāmiʿah ...
  • Toynbee, A. J. (۱۹۸۷). A study of history. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع