The Possibility of Recourse to the Religious Other in Islamic ‎Comparative Theology: An Analysis Grounded in the Qur’an, Hadith, and Reason

سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 68

فایل این مقاله در 36 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTIS-6-1_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 14 مرداد 1405

چکیده مقاله:

Within the confessional approach to comparative theology, epistemic recourse to engagement with other religious traditions aims at attaining a deeper understanding of the home tradition while maintaining fidelity to the boundaries of its orthodoxy and orthopraxy. In this framework, the religious data of other traditions are consulted, examined, and brought into comparison with those of one’s own tradition. From the standpoint of Islamic orthodoxy, however, such engagement requires theoretical justification. This foundational epistemological concern constitutes the central problem addressed in the present study. The guiding question is therefore: within Islamic comparative theology, how can engagement with and benefit from the religious data of other traditions be justified? The study employs a descriptive‑analytical and comparative method. Its findings suggest that the legitimacy of such engagement may be inferred through the cumulative force and mutual corroboration of evidences derived from the Qurʾan, the hadith, and reason. Elements of truth present in other religious traditions may be understood as vestiges of humanity’s historical and prehistorical encounters with the Sacred Source, as well as products of human reason and fiṭrah (the primordial human disposition). Such elements are dispersed across diverse times and places, yet remain accessible to discerning theological inquiry. Furthermore, interreligious learning is not limited to drawing upon the object of comparison—that is, appropriating religious data from another tradition. The act of comparison itself also possesses intrinsic epistemic fecundity. Accordingly, this study concentrates on establishing the justificatory grounds for such engagement, while leaving the systematic articulation of the methodological and inferential frameworks required for interreligious learning to future research.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Mostafa Rastegar

PhD. in comparative study of religions (Christian theology), Faculty of Religions and Mysticism, University ‎of Religions ‎and Denominations, Qom, Iran (Corresponding Author).‎

Sayyid Mostafa Hosseininasab

PhD in Islamic Theoretical Foundations, Imam Khomeini Educational and Research ‎Institute, Qom, Iran. ‎

Sayyid Abdollah Sayyid-Hosseini

Islamic seminary researcher (advanced studies in jurisprudence and the principles of jurisprudence), Qom Islamic ‎Seminary, ‎Qom, Iran.‎

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • * The Holy Qurʾān ...
  • ** Nahj al-balāghah ...
  • Abu Sway, M. (۲۰۰۹). Dialogue and Discernment in the Qur’an. ...
  • Afsaruddin, A. (۲۰۰۹). Discerning a Qur’anic Mandate for Mutually Transformational ...
  • Āmidī, ʿA. b. M. (۱۹۸۹). Ghurar al-ḥikam wa durar al-kalim ...
  • Barqī, A .b. M. (n.d.). Al-maḥāsin (Sayyid Jalāl al-Dīn Moḥaddeth, ...
  • Barth, K. (۱۹۳۶). Church Dogmatics I/۱: The Doctrine of the ...
  • Clooney, F. (۲۰۱۰). Comparative theology: Deep learning across religious borders ...
  • Cornille, C. (۲۰۱۹). Meaning and Method in Comparative Theology. Hoboken: John ...
  • Cornille, C. (۲۰۱۹, July). Comparative Theology: More than Comparing Theologies ...
  • Cornille, C. (۲۰۲۳). Personal conversation with the responsible author at ...
  • Cunningham, P. A., Hofmann, N. J., & Sievers, J. (۲۰۰۷). ...
  • Dāneshvar Nīlū, Y. (۲۰۲۳, March). Personal conversation with the responsible ...
  • Daylamī, Ḥ. b. M. (۱۹۹۱). Irshād al-qulūb ilā al-ṣawāb (۱st ...
  • Dupuis, J. (۱۹۹۷). Toward a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism. Maryknoll: ...
  • Fredericks, J. (۲۰۱۰). Introduction. In The New Comparative Theology, ed. ...
  • Griffiths, P. (۲۰۰۱). Problems of Religious Diversity. Oxford: Blackwell ...
  • Ḥasanzādeh Āmolī, Ḥ. (۱۹۹۴). Annahu al-ḥaqq. Enteshārāt-e Qīyām ...
  • Hillgardner, H. (۲۰۱۶). Longing and Letting Go: Lessons in Being ...
  • Hosseini Beheshti. (۲۰۲۰, June ۲۶). Unpublished speech to the students ...
  • Hussain, S. (۲۰۲۱). The Bitter Lot of the Rebellious Wife: ...
  • Ibn Bābawayh, ʿA. b. Ḥ. (۱۹۸۳ a). Al-imāmah wa-al-tabṣirah min ...
  • Ibn Bābawayh, M. b. ʿA. (۱۹۸۳ b). Man lā yaḥḍuruhu ...
  • Ibn Bābawayh, M. b. ʿA. (۱۹۸۳). Al-khiṣāl (ʿAlī-Akbar Ghaffārī, ed., ...
  • Ibn Bābawayh, M. b. ʿA. (۱۹۸۸). Bilawhar wa Būdāsaf (Muḥammad ...
  • Ibn Sīnā. (۱۰۳۶). Risālat al-ṭayr (Aḥmad ibn Khadīw Akhsīkatī, trans.). ...
  • Ibn Sīnā. (۱۹۹۱). Risālat al-ṭayr (ʿUmar ibn Sahlān Sāwī, Comm.; ...
  • Izutsu, T., & Nasr. Se. H. (۲۰۲۱). Tāo Te Ching: ...
  • Javādī Āmolī, ʿA. (۲۰۰۵). Enteẓār-e bashar az dīn (۳rd ed.). ...
  • Javādī Āmolī, ʿA. (n.d. a). Dars-e tafsīr-e sūreh-ye Qaṣaṣ, session ...
  • Javādī Āmolī, ʿA. (n.d. b). Nasīm-e andīsheh: Porsesh-hā va pāsokh-hā ...
  • Kadivar, M. (۲۰۲۳). Āqā-ye Ṭabāṭabāʾī, enqelāb va neẓām–۲: Shavāhedī tāzeh ...
  • Khorchide, M., & Topkara, U. (۲۰۱۳). A Contribution to Comparative ...
  • Kulaynī, M. b. Y. (۱۹۸۶). Al-kāfī (ʿAlī-Akbar Ghaffārī, ed.). Tehran: ...
  • Legenhausen, M. (۲۰۲۳). Personal conversation with the responsible author at ...
  • Mahdavi Mehr, V. (۲۰۲۲). Can There Be an Islamic Comparative ...
  • Majlisī, M. B. b. M. T. (۱۹۸۲). Biḥār al-anwār: Al-jāmiʿah ...
  • Majlisī, M. B. b. M. T. (۱۹۸۴). Mirʾāt al-ʿuqūl fī ...
  • Majlisī, M. B. b. M. T. (۲۰۰۷). Tuḥfat al-zāʾir (Moʾasseseh-ye ...
  • Maʿrefat, M. H. (۲۰۰۹). Al-tamhīd fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān (۲nd ed.). ...
  • Markaz-e Eṭṭelāʿāt va Madārek-e Eslāmī. (۲۰۱۰). Farhangnāmeh-ye Oṣūl-e feqh (Aḥmad ...
  • Moḥammadī Reyshahrī, M. & Berenjkār, R. (۲۰۱۰). Al-ʿilm wa al-ḥikmah ...
  • Müller, M. (۱۸۷۴). Chips from a German Workshop. New York: Scribner, ...
  • Neville, R. (۲۰۱۷, March ۶). Religion-Specific or Trans-Religious? [video]. Harvard ...
  • Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue and Congregation for the Evangelization ...
  • Shahīd al-Thānī, Zayn al-Dīn ibn ʿAlī. (۲۰۰۰). Kashf al-raybah ʿan ...
  • Shāyegān, D. (۲۰۰۳). Āyīn-e Hendū va ʿerfān-e Eslāmī: Bar asās-e ...
  • Stewart, L. (۲۰۰۹). Ha-Neshamah (הנשמה). Lenard Newport Press ...
  • Ṭabāṭabāʾī, S. M. Ḥ. (۲۰۰۸). Tarjomeh-ye tafsīr al-Mīzān (Sayyid Moḥammad ...
  • Tatari, M. (۲۰۱۸). Using Comparative Insights in Developing Kalām: A ...
  • Thatamanil, J. (۲۰۲۳). A Comparative Theology of Religious Diversity [video, ...
  • Tracy, D. (۲۰۰۵). Comparative Theology. Encyclopedia of Religion. (L. Jones, ...
  • Universität Bonn. (n.d.). CV of Prof. Dr. Klaus von Stosch. ...
  • Von Stosch, K. (۲۰۱۴). Is Comparative Theology Catholic? Studies in ...
  • Von Stosch, K. (April-July, ۲۰۲۳). Souvenir of Bonn: A conversation ...
  • Wilhelm, J. (۱۹۱۰). Loci Theologici. The Catholic Encyclopedia. (New Advent). ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع