Differential Effects of Cognitive Load on Working Memory in Students with Linguistic Versus Perceptual Dyslexia
سال انتشار: 1405
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 32
فایل این مقاله در 14 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_PRIEN-4-1_005
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 1 تیر 1405
چکیده مقاله:
Children with dyslexia do not demonstrate homogeneous neuropsychological characteristics. The present study aimed to compare verbal working memory performance under different levels of cognitive load between two primary dyslexia subgroups, namely perceptual and linguistic types. In this comparative research design, ۳۵ Persian-speaking children aged ۷ to ۱۰ years were selected through purposive sampling. Diagnostic and subgroup classification procedures were conducted based on the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-۵), the Reading Test (Pour-Etemad & Jahani, ۲۰۰۱), Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices, the Conners Parent Rating Scale, and the application of Baker’s balance model framework. The primary assessment instrument was a computerized verbal N-Back task. The collected data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The findings indicated a significant interaction between subgroup type and cognitive load level. Although the performance of the two groups was similar at lower task demands (۱-Back and ۲-Back conditions), a clear differentiation emerged under high cognitive load conditions (۲-Back), such that the accuracy of the perceptual subgroup was significantly higher than that of the linguistic subgroup. These results suggest that verbal working memory deficits in dyslexia are neither global nor stable; rather, they follow a cognitive load–dependent pattern specific to the linguistic subtype. The evidence provides compelling support for the existence of distinct cognitive architectures and underscores the necessity of designing targeted and individualized intervention programs. Children with dyslexia do not demonstrate homogeneous neuropsychological characteristics. The present study aimed to compare verbal working memory performance under different levels of cognitive load between two primary dyslexia subgroups, namely perceptual and linguistic types. In this comparative research design, ۳۵ Persian-speaking children aged ۷ to ۱۰ years were selected through purposive sampling. Diagnostic and subgroup classification procedures were conducted based on the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-۵), the Reading Test (Pour-Etemad & Jahani, ۲۰۰۱), Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices, the Conners Parent Rating Scale, and the application of Baker’s balance model framework. The primary assessment instrument was a computerized verbal N-Back task. The collected data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The findings indicated a significant interaction between subgroup type and cognitive load level. Although the performance of the two groups was similar at lower task demands (۱-Back and ۲-Back conditions), a clear differentiation emerged under high cognitive load conditions (۲-Back), such that the accuracy of the perceptual subgroup was significantly higher than that of the linguistic subgroup. These results suggest that verbal working memory deficits in dyslexia are neither global nor stable; rather, they follow a cognitive load–dependent pattern specific to the linguistic subtype. The evidence provides compelling support for the existence of distinct cognitive architectures and underscores the necessity of designing targeted and individualized intervention programs.
کلیدواژه ها:
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :