Feasibility of the Role of the International Criminal Court in Addressing Gender Apartheid Against Women in Afghanistan

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 11

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ISSLP-4-4_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 فروردین 1405

چکیده مقاله:

The political environment in Afghanistan, characterized by systemic discrimination against women and extreme misogyny, has led to discussions among experts and human rights activists regarding the recognition of gender apartheid in Afghanistan. The central question that arises and is explored in this regard is whether the International Criminal Court (ICC) can play a role in addressing gender apartheid against women in Afghanistan. In other words, can the ICC intervene in addressing gender apartheid against women in Afghanistan? This article is descriptive-analytical and examines the aforementioned question through library research methods. The findings suggest that the Rome Statute recognizes the jurisdiction of the Court over several crimes, including crimes against humanity. However, gender apartheid is neither recognized as a crime under international law nor does the ICC have the jurisdiction to address it as a crime against humanity. Gender apartheid, like racial apartheid, could be recognized as an international crime, especially a crime against humanity. In this context, it is necessary for gender apartheid to be added either as an optional protocol to existing conventions, such as the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination or the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, or to be developed as an independent protocol. This requires political will and the investment of political capital within the United Nations system.The political environment in Afghanistan, characterized by systemic discrimination against women and extreme misogyny, has led to discussions among experts and human rights activists regarding the recognition of gender apartheid in Afghanistan. The central question that arises and is explored in this regard is whether the International Criminal Court (ICC) can play a role in addressing gender apartheid against women in Afghanistan. In other words, can the ICC intervene in addressing gender apartheid against women in Afghanistan? This article is descriptive-analytical and examines the aforementioned question through library research methods. The findings suggest that the Rome Statute recognizes the jurisdiction of the Court over several crimes, including crimes against humanity. However, gender apartheid is neither recognized as a crime under international law nor does the ICC have the jurisdiction to address it as a crime against humanity. Gender apartheid, like racial apartheid, could be recognized as an international crime, especially a crime against humanity. In this context, it is necessary for gender apartheid to be added either as an optional protocol to existing conventions, such as the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination or the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, or to be developed as an independent protocol. This requires political will and the investment of political capital within the United Nations system.

نویسندگان

Asma Lotfi

PhD Student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.

Anahinta Seifi

Assistant Professor, Department of Women's Studies, Allameh tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

Mohammad Rezaei

Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Andre, P., & Haddadi, M. (2005). Complementarity Jurisdiction and Concurrent ...
  • Anisi, F. (2004). Afghan Refugee Women: Doubts and Realities. Payam-e ...
  • Babakhani, M., & Ghasemi, A. (2016). Pornography from the Perspective ...
  • Cassese, A. (2013). Cassese's International Criminal Law (3rd ed.). Oxford ...
  • Dadashzadeh, A. R., & Habibi, J. (2008). Analysis and Examination ...
  • Hosseini, M. M. (2018). Violence Against Women in Afghanistan from ...
  • Kamminga, M. T. (1992). Interstate Accountability for Violations of Human ...
  • Khavari, A., & Simber. (2022). A comparative study of the ...
  • Mirjafari, S. H., Zarneshan, S., & Rahmatifar, S. (2023). Universal ...
  • Momeni, M. (2017). Evaluation of Iranian Criminal Jurisdiction and the ...
  • Pourbafrani, H. (2003). Principle of Universal Jurisdiction in International Criminal ...
  • Rasouli, M., & Mohammadi, S. B. (2023). Afghanistan's Judicial Criminal ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع