Pain and Surgical Outcomes in Ankle Fracture and Syndesmosis Injury: Comparing Screw and Flexible Fixation Methods in a Cohort Study

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 3

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TRAUM-30-6_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 دی 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: Although the importance of anatomical repair and fixation for syndesmotic injury has been emphasized, the best surgical approach remains a topic of discussion. This study sought to evaluate and compare the post-operative pain and surgical outcomes between screw fixation and the suture endobutton method in patients with Weber type C ankle fractures. Methods: A total of ۵۶ consecutive patients with Weber type C ankle fractures participated in this prospective cohort study and underwent either screw fixation or suture endobutton surgery in ۲۰۲۲. Pain, infection, and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were monitored ۳, ۶, and ۱۲ months’ post-operation. Results: The study included ۱۴ women and ۴۲ men, aged ۱۸ to ۴۷ years. There were no differences in age and sex between the two surgical groups. The pain score was significantly lower in the suture endobutton group compared to the screw fixation group three months after the operation (P=۰.۰۴۲). However, the two groups had no significant differences in pain scores at six and twelve months. Within each treatment method, the pain scores were statistically significantly different over time (Ptotal<۰.۰۰۱ in two groups). The suture endobutton method resulted in higher FAOS scores compared to the screw fixation method at three, six, and twelve months after surgery. The difference in this score within each group during the follow-up period was statistically significant (Ptotal<۰.۰۰۱ in two groups). Conclusion: The suture endobutton method has demonstrated advantages over screw fixation surgery. Patients have improved performance at three, six, and twelve months’ post-surgery, indicating that it may be a potentially superior approach to treating syndesmosis injuries.

نویسندگان

Arash Aris

Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Center, Trauma Institute, Poursina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Kamran Asadi

Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Center, Trauma Institute, Poursina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Amir Farhangi

Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Center, Trauma Institute, Poursina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Mohammadali Yazdanipour

Neuroscience Research Center, Trauma Institute, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Nima Faghirpour

Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Trauma Institute, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran