Tutorial on Methods to Adjust for Confounding Variable in Medical Research

سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 53

فایل این مقاله در 7 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JCHR-14-1_014

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 7 دی 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Confounders can distort the actual connection between exposure and outcome, resulting in skewed results. In research, it is essential to account for confounding variables to preserve the validity of causal inferences.  Methods: In this narrative review study, all statistical methods for adjusting confounding variable such as standardization, propensity score, stratification, restriction, statistical model for control, matching, randomization were reviewed.  Results: The five most important methods were reviewed. Conclusion: Adequate adjustment improves the internal validity of findings and elucidates the relationships among variables, underscoring the importance of a comprehensive analysis of confounding for trustworthy research results.

نویسندگان

Muhammad Ajmal Dina

Center for Healthcare Data Modeling, Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Farzan Madidadizadeh

Center for Healthcare Data Modeling, Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Anam Arshed

Rahbar Medical and Dental College, Lahore Pakistan

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Hammad TA, Davis S, Afsar S. Exploring the scientific underpinnings ...
  • Eaton AA, Saunders JF, Jacobson RK, West K. How gender ...
  • Gelbard RB, Cripps MW. Pitfalls in study interpretation. Surgical Infections. ...
  • Agoritsas T, Merglen A, Shah ND, O’Donnell M, Guyatt GH. ...
  • Kim J-S, Frees EW. Omitted variables in multilevel models. Psychometrika. ...
  • Keiding N, Clayton D. Standardization and control for confounding in ...
  • Kedem B, Fokianos K. Regression models for time series analysis: ...
  • Rohrer JM. Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal ...
  • Zhao Q-Y, Luo J-C, Su Y, Zhang Y-J, Tu G-W, ...
  • Bero L, Chartres N, Diong J, Fabbri A, Ghersi D, ...
  • Brand JE, Zhou X, Xie Y. Recent developments in causal ...
  • Coscia C, Gill D, Benítez R, Pérez T, Malats N, ...
  • Hahn PR, Murray JS, Carvalho CM. Bayesian regression tree models ...
  • Barone C. Analytical sociology and social stratification research. Research Handbook ...
  • Breyer M. Perceptions of the social status hierarchy and its ...
  • Perico N, Askenazi D, Cortinovis M, Remuzzi G. Maternal and ...
  • Gong C, Wang C, Meng X, Fan B, Xing Z, ...
  • Bussas M, El Husseini M, Harabacz L, Pineker V, Grahl ...
  • Schwartz S, Prins SJ. Causal Inference and the People's Health: ...
  • Correia KF, Dodge LE, Farland LV, Hacker MR, Ginsburg E, ...
  • Huybrechts KF, Bateman BT, Hernández‐Díaz S. Use of real‐world evidence ...
  • Matthay EC, Smith ML, Glymour MM, White JS, Gradus JL. ...
  • Lipsitch M, Tchetgen ET, Cohen T. Negative controls: a tool ...
  • Ngo THD, La Puente C, editors. The steps to follow ...
  • McNamee R. Regression modelling and other methods to control confounding. ...
  • Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing ...
  • Anney VN. Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative ...
  • Frick U, Rehm J. Can we establish causality with statistical ...
  • Fewell Z, Davey Smith G, Sterne JA. The impact of ...
  • Bailey DH, Borwein J, Lopez de Prado M, Zhu QJ. ...
  • Heinze G, Wallisch C, Dunkler D. Variable selection–a review and ...
  • Iwagami M, Shinozaki T. Introduction to matching in case-control and ...
  • King G, Nielsen R. Why propensity scores should not be ...
  • Zayed S, Chen H, Ali E, Rodrigues GB, Warner A, ...
  • Strang KD. Matching research method with ideology and strategy. The ...
  • Aneshensel CS. Theory-based data analysis for the social sciences: Sage ...
  • March JS, Silva SG, Compton S, Shapiro M, Califf R, ...
  • Liu J, Barrett JS, Leonardi ET, Lee L, Roychoudhury S, ...
  • Levine MM, Nasrin D, Acácio S, Bassat Q, Powell H, ...
  • Scriven M. A summative evaluation of RCT methodology: & an ...
  • Seeger JD, Davis KJ, Iannacone MR, Zhou W, Dreyer N, ...
  • Gill DP, Blunt W, Boa Sorte Silva N, Stiller-Moldovan C, ...
  • Sanderson E, Glymour MM, Holmes MV, Kang H, Morrison J, ...
  • Lakens D. Sample size justification. Collabra: psychology. ۲۰۲۲;۸(۱):۳۳۲۶۷ ...
  • Berger VW, Bour LJ, Carter K, Chipman JJ, Everett CC, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع