Prospective Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Predictive Analytics in Preoperative Surgical Decision-Making: A Systematic Review
محل انتشار: InfoScience Trends، دوره: 2، شماره: 6
سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 120
فایل این مقاله در 16 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_ISJTREND-2-6_002
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 آذر 1404
چکیده مقاله:
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive analytics tools hold promise for enhancing preoperative surgical decision-making, but their prospective clinical and operational impacts remain underexplored. This systematic review evaluates studies assessing AI tools in preoperative settings, focusing on their influence on clinical decisions and workflow efficiency. A comprehensive search of PubMed and Google Scholar, supplemented by citation tracking, was conducted up to December ۲۰۲۴, using MeSH terms and keywords related to AI, preoperative care, and prospective study designs. Inclusion criteria targeted prospective clinical trials, implementation studies, or high-fidelity simulations of AI tools for risk stratification, resource planning, or procedural decisions in surgical specialties. Two reviewers screened records and extracted data on study design, AI tool application, and outcomes (e.g., predictive accuracy, decision impact). Of the ۹۵۰ screened records, ۱۴ studies (randomized trials, implementations, and simulations) met the inclusion criteria. AI tools consistently outperformed traditional methods, achieving AUROCs ≥۰.۸۵ for mortality and complication predictions. Randomized trials showed improved clinician agreement (e.g., weighted kappa increases of ۰.۱۳–۰.۲۵) and operational efficiency (e.g., ۱۱.۲% fewer underpredicted surgical cases). However, direct clinical outcome improvements remain understudied. AI-based predictive analytics enhance preoperative decision-making and operational efficiency but require further multi-center trials to confirm clinical benefits. Seamless workflow integration and bias monitoring are critical for adoption.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Yasin Sharifzadeh
Clinical Research Development Unit, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Fatemeh Mahmoudlou
Faculty of Medicine, Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Mohammad Qamati
Department of Orthopedics, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Nima Massomi
Department of Orthopedics, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :