Suhrawardī’s Epistemology of Sense Perception: Direct or Indirect Realism?

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: فارسی
مشاهده: 132

فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_COTH-16-2_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 شهریور 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Sense perception is a specific type of perception that arises from the mind’s encounter with the tangible world through the activation of one of the five senses (sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell). Through this process, a person discovers the surrounding world and acquires a significant portion of their awareness. Sense perception is considered one of the important sources of human knowledge. Realistic theories of sense perception are categorized into two main types: "direct realism" and "indirect realism". According to direct realism, individuals can directly identify the entirety or, at the very least, some qualities of physical objects around them without the involvement of a mental medium. In contrast, indirect realism posits the existence of a mental medium, referred to as a "sense-datum", as the immediate object of knowledge. The majority of Islamic philosophers adhere to indirect realism, with Sheikh Shihāb al-Dīn Yaḥyā Suhrawardī being a notable proponent of direct realism. Presently, most contemporary Western epistemologists lend support to direct realism. Suhrawardī's perspective initially appears ambiguous, as some of his works suggest an inclination towards mental mediation, while others indicate a belief in direct realism. This article aims to delve into Suhrawardī's viewpoint and establish that his definitive stance aligns with direct realism.

کلیدواژه ها:

sense perception ، Shihāb al-Dīn Yaḥyā Suhrawardī ، direct realism theory ، indirect realism theory

نویسندگان

Hadi Ramazanpour

MA, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abdolrasoul Kashfi

Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Maftouni, N. (۲۰۱۳). The foundations and consequences of Suhrawardi’s theory ...
  • Mullā Ṣadrā (۲۰۰۷). Al-Shawahid al-Rubūbiyya (۴th ed). Kitāb Būstān. [In ...
  • Rāzī, F. (۱۹۹۱). Al-Mabāhith al-Mashriqiyya. Bīdār Publications. [In Arabic] ...
  • Suhrawardī, Sh. (۱۹۹۳a). Bustān al-Qulūb. In H. Corbin (Ed.), Euvres ...
  • Suhrawardī, Sh. (۱۹۹۳b). Hayākil al-Nūr. In H. Corbin (Ed.), Euvres ...
  • Suhrawardī, Sh. (۱۹۹۳c). Partow Nāme. In H. Corbin (Ed.), Euvres ...
  • Suhrawardī, Sh. (۲۰۰۱). Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq. In H. Corbin (Ed.), Euvres ...
  • Suhrawardī, Sh. (۲۰۰۹). Alwāḥ al-‘Imādiyya. In N. Habibi (Ed.), Euvres ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع