Biomimetic Wound Dressings: Advancements, Applications, and Challenges in Modern Wound Care
سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 22
فایل این مقاله در 18 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_IRANJB-1-1_007
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 مرداد 1404
چکیده مقاله:
Wound dressings are critical in managing various injuries, including pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, and diabetic foot ulcers. Various dressing materials are employed in wound care, such as traditional dressings, interactive materials, skin substitutes, bioactive dressings, and dermal grafts. These materials, both synthetic and biological, contribute to effective wound healing by supporting the regeneration of skin tissues. However, biomimetic wound dressings are emerging as a superior alternative to conventional dressings due to their ability to align more closely with the natural wound healing process. Among these, hydrogels are particularly promising for their capacity to replicate the biological properties of human skin, offering enhanced moisture retention, flexibility, and biocompatibility. Biomimetic wound dressings are available in various forms, including films, gauzes, injectable gels, and sprays, catering to different wound types and healing stages. In recent years, the development of novel wound dressings has become a focal point in biomedical engineering, with a strong emphasis on leveraging the benefits of biomaterials. These advanced dressings promote faster healing and offer various advantages, such as reduced infection risk and improved patient comfort. However, despite their potential, biomimetic dressings also present specific challenges, such as production costs and variability in performance across different wound types. This review explores the strengths and limitations of biomaterial-based wound dressings, highlighting their growing significance in modern wound care and future therapeutic applications.Wound dressings are critical in managing various injuries, including pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, and diabetic foot ulcers. Various dressing materials are employed in wound care, such as traditional dressings, interactive materials, skin substitutes, bioactive dressings, and dermal grafts. These materials, both synthetic and biological, contribute to effective wound healing by supporting the regeneration of skin tissues. However, biomimetic wound dressings are emerging as a superior alternative to conventional dressings due to their ability to align more closely with the natural wound healing process. Among these, hydrogels are particularly promising for their capacity to replicate the biological properties of human skin, offering enhanced moisture retention, flexibility, and biocompatibility. Biomimetic wound dressings are available in various forms, including films, gauzes, injectable gels, and sprays, catering to different wound types and healing stages. In recent years, the development of novel wound dressings has become a focal point in biomedical engineering, with a strong emphasis on leveraging the benefits of biomaterials. These advanced dressings promote faster healing and offer various advantages, such as reduced infection risk and improved patient comfort. However, despite their potential, biomimetic dressings also present specific challenges, such as production costs and variability in performance across different wound types. This review explores the strengths and limitations of biomaterial-based wound dressings, highlighting their growing significance in modern wound care and future therapeutic applications.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Ehsan Ghiasy Nick
Caspian Faculty of Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Rezvanshahr, Gilan, Iran
Mohsen Shahrousvand
Caspian Faculty of Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Rezvanshahr, Gilan, Iran
Seyed Armin Fazeli Masouleh
Department of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
Alireza Feizkhah
Burn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
Bahar Alizadeh
School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :