Artificial Intelligence detects gastric ulcer in endoscopic images: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 103

متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

AIMS02_522

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 تیر 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Background and Aims: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) affects ۵-۱۰% of the global population and can lead to gastric cancer if not detected early. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in gastroenterology may improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, but there is insufficient evidence on its specific performance for diagnosing gastric ulcers. This study aims to evaluate image-based machine learning and deep learning techniques for diagnosing gastric ulcers, with the goal of guiding clinical decision-making and future research. Methods: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science until September ۱۱, ۲۰۲۴. QUADAS-۲ was selected to judge the risk of bias in the included articles. Independent reviewers screened studies and assessed eligibility, certainty of evidence, and risk of bias. A univariate meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and, subsequently, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-), along with the bivariate Reitsma method to compute SROC using R version ۴.۴.۲. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database [CRD۴۲۰۲۴۶۱۱۵۸۳]. Results: Twenty-three studies were eligible for qualitative analysis, of which sixteen were included in quantitative meta-analysis. The pooled DOR, sensitivity, and specificity of classification of gastric ulcer against other lesions or normal tissue were ۸۰.۸۰ [۹۵% CI: ۳۷.۸۹ – ۱۷۲.۳۱], ۰.۸۵۴ [۹۵% CI: ۰.۸۲۹ – ۰.۸۷۵], and ۰.۹۲۹ [۹۵% CI: ۰.۹۰۶ – ۰.۹۴۷], respectively. The studies analyzing only CNN showed a DOR of ۷۶.۷۸ [۹۵% CI: ۳۲.۵۳ – ۱۸۱.۲۲], while studies utilizing machine learning and feature fusion, in addition to the convolutional neural network, exhibited a DOR of ۸۷.۹۳ [۹۵% CI: ۶۱.۷۴ – ۱۲۵.۲۳]. The SROC curve analysis reveals a diagnostic test with a high AUC of ۰.۹۳۴ [۹۵% CI], indicating excellent overall accuracy and reliability for clinical application. Conclusion: Machine learning and Deep learning models demonstrate promising potential in detecting gastric ulcers in classification tasks against other pathologies. Further prospective multicenter studies, with standardized

نویسندگان

Behrad Eftekhari

Gastrointestinal and liver diseases research center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Anita Khalili

Gastrointestinal and liver diseases research center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Ervin Zadgari

Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Saeed Ghaffari

Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran

Soheil Hassanipour

Gastrointestinal and liver diseases research center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran