Application of Artificial Intelligence in physician and nursing clinical reasoning: A Systematic Review

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 110

متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

AIMS02_428

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 تیر 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Background and Aims: Clinical reasoning is a fundamental process in medicine and nursing that helps analyze patient data, make differential diagnoses, and formulate treatment plans. However, challenges such as cognitive biases and the large volume of medical information can lead to diagnostic errors. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the ability to process large volumes of medical data and identify patterns beyond human capabilities using machine learning and deep learning algorithms. This systematic review examines the role of AI in clinical reasoning, focusing on its applications, benefits, limitations, and ethical considerations. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google scholars’ databases was conducted between January ۲۰۱۵ and December ۲۰۲۴. Keywords used included “artificial intelligence”, “clinical reasoning”, “machine learning”, “diagnostic accuracy”, “cognitive bias” and “decision support systems”. Studies were included that evaluated applications of AI in clinical reasoning, evaluated by PRISMA checklist and provided quantitative or qualitative results. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data and assessed study quality. Results: ۱۲۴۵ studies identified, ۳۵ studies were eligible. ۱۷ studies showed that AI improved accuracy, particularly in radiology, pathology and electronic health records. Twelve studies examined the role of AI in reducing cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and anchoring, and found that AI increases diagnostic reliability. Eleven studies looked at integrating AI into clinical workflows and showed that AI-based decision support systems can process large amounts of data to provide more accurate and faster diagnoses. However, eight studies addressed ethical and practical challenges, showing that AI can inherit biases from training data and that the “black box” problem in AI models reduces the transparency of decision-making. Seven studies

نویسندگان

Zahra Farrokhi

Medical student, faculty of medicine, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

Sorour Mosleh

PhD students of medical education, Educational Development Center, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Mohammad Sadegh Aboutalebi

Nursing and Midwifery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Zahra Ebrahimi

Nursing and Midwifery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Somaye Nickhah

Educational Development Center, Medical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Athar Omid

Assistant Professor in Educational Development Center, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran