The Development of Collaborative Course Design Questionnaire: A Measure of Students’ Attitudes towards Collaborative Course Design and Barriers to its Implementation

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 58

فایل این مقاله در 26 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJALS-17-1_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 فروردین 1404

چکیده مقاله:

This research aims to develop a questionnaire that measures students’ attitudes toward collaborative course design and identifies any barriers that might hinder student participation in course design. The questionnaire was developed in four phases. First, an item pool was created based on experts’ opinions, relevant literature, and the researchers’ experience. Second, the items were classified into two main sections: “attitudes” and “barriers”, with the latter further divided into five subcategories (social and cultural, educational and institutional, individual, practical, and attitudinal). The content validity of the questionnaire was assessed, with all items and subcategories achieving CVR>۰.۵۹ and CVI>۰.۷۹, thus surpassing the minimum required threshold. Third, the questionnaire was piloted with ۳۳۰ students. The construct validity of the Collaborative Course Design Questionnaire (CCDQ) was confirmed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as the extraction method, along with Varimax rotation, which identified six factors explaining ۷۱.۵۳۶% of the variance in the data. Finally, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated, yielding reliability indices ranging from ۰.۹۷۱ to ۰.۶۲۷, indicating internal consistency and reliability of the items within each construct. The findings suggest that the Collaborative Course Design Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument suitable for use with senior high school students.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Bahroz Mawlood

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Mahdi Hasanpour Ghaleh

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Zahra Dolati

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Amir Mahdavi Zafarqandi

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, ...
  • Anghelache, V. (۲۰۱۳). Determinant factors of students’ attitudes toward learning. Procedia-Social ...
  • Barratt, C. C., Parrott, J., & Presley, E. (۲۰۱۱). The ...
  • Bovill, C. (۲۰۲۰). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case ...
  • Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (۲۰۱۱). Students as ...
  • Bryson, C., Furlonger, R., & Rinaldo-Langridge, F. (۲۰۱۵). A critical ...
  • Bulger, M. E., Murphy J. C., Scheible, J., & Lagresa, ...
  • Cohen, R., & Mule, L. (۲۰۱۹). Collaborative pedagogy in a ...
  • Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (۲۰۰۵). An on-going journey: Technology ...
  • Cook-Sather, A. (۲۰۰۸). What you get is looking in a ...
  • Delpish, A., Darby, A., Holmes, A., Knight-McKenna, M., Mihans, R., ...
  • Demarrais, K., Roulston, K., & Copple, J. (۲۰۲۴). Qualitative research ...
  • Denzin, N. K. (۱۹۷۸). The research act: A theoretical introduction ...
  • Dunne, E. (۲۰۱۶). Design thinking: A framework for student engagement? ...
  • Furlong, A. & Cartmel, F. (۲۰۰۹). Higher education and social ...
  • Gorsuch, R. L. (۱۹۷۴). Factor analysis. Saunders ...
  • Greenwald, A. G. (۲۰۱۴). Why attitudes are important: Defining attitude ...
  • Griffin, B. W. (۲۰۰۹). Cronbach’s Alpha (measure of internal consistency). ...
  • Grudens-Schuck, N. (۲۰۰۳). No beginners: Teaching participation at the graduate ...
  • Handelzalts, A. (۲۰۰۹). Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams ...
  • Hanna-Benson, C., Kroeze, S., Gandhi, R., Haffie, T., & Wahl, ...
  • Hess, G. (۲۰۰۸). Collaborative course design: Not my course, not ...
  • Hutchings, P. (۲۰۰۵). Building pedagogical intelligence. Carnegie Perspectives. The Carnegie ...
  • Könings, D., Mordang, S., Frank, M., Laurents, S. (۲۰۲۰). Learner ...
  • Lawshe, C. H. (۱۹۷۵). A quantitative approach to content validity. ...
  • Martens, E., Meeuwissen, S., Dolmans D., Bovill C., & Konings ...
  • Mead, L. (۲۰۱۸). Faculty perspectives of student-faculty collaborative course design. ...
  • Mihans, R. J., Long, D., & Felten, P. (۲۰۰۸). Power ...
  • Nemoto, T., & Beglar, D. (۲۰۱۴). Likert-scale questionnaires. In JALT ۲۰۱۳ ...
  • Nihuka, K.A. (۲۰۱۹). Impact of collaborative course design on instructors’ ...
  • Shayegan Far, M. A. (۲۰۲۳). An evaluation of Iranian EFL ...
  • Shor, I. (۱۹۹۲). Empowering education. University of Chicago Press ...
  • Steward, M., Cohn, J., Whithaus, C. (۲۰۱۶). Collaborative course design ...
  • Streiner, D. L. (۲۰۰۳). Starting at the beginning: An introduction ...
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (۱۹۹۶). Using multivariate ...
  • Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, R. B. (۱۹۸۱). Nursing research: ...
  • Wilkinson, M., & Scandrett, E. (۲۰۰۳). A popular education approach ...
  • Yancey, K. B., & Spooner, M. (۱۹۹۸). A single good ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع