Evaluation of Serological Response of Low and Highly Pathogenic Influenza Vaccines in Japanese Quails
سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 99
فایل این مقاله در 7 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JPSAD-3-2_006
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 اسفند 1403
چکیده مقاله:
Avian influenza A virus (AIV) causes one of the most transmissible diseases. This virus can infect the quails and be spread to other animal species. Vaccination in chickens and ducks has shown that highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAI) can be controlled. This study evaluated the serological response of low and highly pathogenic influenza vaccines in quails. One hundred forty-day-old quails were divided into seven groups. Before vaccination, ۲۰ blood samples were randomly collected from the quail wing vein. At ۲۱ days of age, Group ۲ was vaccinated with the H۹N۲ vaccine. Quails in Group ۴ were vaccinated with the H۵N۱ influenza vaccine (Harbin). Quails in Group ۶ received the H۵N۱ vaccine (Livaning). At ۴۲ days of age, Groups ۳, ۵, and ۷ were re-vaccinated with the same vaccines as in the previous stage. Blood samples were collected from each group from ۲۰ quails at ۲۰, ۴۲, and ۵۶ days to determine AIV antibodies by the HI test. Three weeks after the second vaccination (H۹N۲), the antibody titer was higher than in the group that received the vaccine once, but the difference was insignificant. The antibody titer after the second Harbin vaccine (H۵N۱) was higher than in the group receiving only one dose, but the difference was negligible. The antibody titer at ۶۳ days was higher in the group that received one dose of the Livaning (H۵N۱) vaccine, and this difference was significant. After the second vaccination, there was a significant difference in the titers between the two doses of H۹N۲ and H۵N۱ for the Livaning and Harbin vaccines. The average increase in antibody production following the two doses of H۹N۲ and Harbin vaccines showed similar trends. However, the Livaning vaccine produced a significantly higher antibody response than the other two (p<۰.۰۵).Avian influenza A virus (AIV) causes one of the most transmissible diseases. This virus can infect the quails and be spread to other animal species. Vaccination in chickens and ducks has shown that highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAI) can be controlled. This study evaluated the serological response of low and highly pathogenic influenza vaccines in quails. One hundred forty-day-old quails were divided into seven groups. Before vaccination, ۲۰ blood samples were randomly collected from the quail wing vein. At ۲۱ days of age, Group ۲ was vaccinated with the H۹N۲ vaccine. Quails in Group ۴ were vaccinated with the H۵N۱ influenza vaccine (Harbin). Quails in Group ۶ received the H۵N۱ vaccine (Livaning). At ۴۲ days of age, Groups ۳, ۵, and ۷ were re-vaccinated with the same vaccines as in the previous stage. Blood samples were collected from each group from ۲۰ quails at ۲۰, ۴۲, and ۵۶ days to determine AIV antibodies by the HI test. Three weeks after the second vaccination (H۹N۲), the antibody titer was higher than in the group that received the vaccine once, but the difference was insignificant. The antibody titer after the second Harbin vaccine (H۵N۱) was higher than in the group receiving only one dose, but the difference was negligible. The antibody titer at ۶۳ days was higher in the group that received one dose of the Livaning (H۵N۱) vaccine, and this difference was significant. After the second vaccination, there was a significant difference in the titers between the two doses of H۹N۲ and H۵N۱ for the Livaning and Harbin vaccines. The average increase in antibody production following the two doses of H۹N۲ and Harbin vaccines showed similar trends. However, the Livaning vaccine produced a significantly higher antibody response than the other two (p<۰.۰۵).
نویسندگان
Elahah Golgol
DVSc. Student of Avian Health and Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Mansour Mayahi
Department of livestock, poultry and aquatic animal health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Zahra Boroomand
Department of livestock, poultry and aquatic animal health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Ali Zaherzadeh
Jundi -Shapur University of Technology, Dezful, Iran