Psychometric evaluation and factor structure of the Persian coping strategies questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients

سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 219

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JCOMS-4-4_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 14 بهمن 1403

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) in Persian in people with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP).Materials and methods: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were employed to determine the CSQ's factor structure. Reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Coefficient and Cronbach's Alpha.Results: ۱۳ variables, accounting for ۷۴.۹۴% of the total variance, were identified using EFA; based on Parallel Analysis, the first four components—ignoring pain sensations, praying, diverting attention, and catastrophizing—were kept. A sufficient model fit was not shown by the CFA results (χ²/df = ۱.۷۷, CFI = ۰.۸۸۴, TLI = ۰.۸۴, and RMSEA = ۰.۰۸۱). All subscales had Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability between ۰.۷۵ and ۰.۸۸ and ۰.۷ and ۰.۸۳, respectively.Conclusion: According to the study's findings, there are four-factor structures in the Persian version. Additionally, it was stated that the item-total correlations, agreement, and test-retest reliability were all at a good and acceptable level.Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) in Persian in people with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). Materials and methods: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were employed to determine the CSQ's factor structure. Reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Coefficient and Cronbach's Alpha. Results: ۱۳ variables, accounting for ۷۴.۹۴% of the total variance, were identified using EFA; based on Parallel Analysis, the first four components—ignoring pain sensations, praying, diverting attention, and catastrophizing—were kept. A sufficient model fit was not shown by the CFA results (χ²/df = ۱.۷۷, CFI = ۰.۸۸۴, TLI = ۰.۸۴, and RMSEA = ۰.۰۸۱). All subscales had Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability between ۰.۷۵ and ۰.۸۸ and ۰.۷ and ۰.۸۳, respectively. Conclusion: According to the study's findings, there are four-factor structures in the Persian version. Additionally, it was stated that the item-total correlations, agreement, and test-retest reliability were all at a good and acceptable level.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Sarvenaz Karimi-GhasemAbad

Razi Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran / Physiotherapy Department of University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Behnam Akhbari

Physiotherapy Department of University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mahyar Salavati

Physiotherapy Department of University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Saeed Talebian Moghaddam

Physiotherapy Department of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ahmad Saeedi

Department of Statistical Research and Information Technology, Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, Tehran, Iran

Mahsa Seydi

Neuroscience Research Australia of University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Mohammad Ali Shakoorianfard

Physiotherapy Department of Physiotherapy Department of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Rehabilitation Faculty, Tehran, Iran