Evaluating Proximate, Antinutrient, and Antioxidant Activity of Raw and Processed Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd) Flour and Developing Food Products by Incorporating Them
محل انتشار: فصلنامه تغذیه و امنیت غذایی، دوره: 9، شماره: 3
سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 50
فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JNFS-9-3_016
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 شهریور 1403
چکیده مقاله:
This study evaluates proximate, antinutrient, and antioxidant activities of raw and processed quinoa flour (RQF and PQF). Product development and sensory evaluation were also addressed to provide prospects for human consumption. Methods: Quinoa was processed by two methods - soaking and roasting. Some nutrients like moisture, ash, protein, carbohydrate, crude fibre, fat, iron, calcium, vitamin C, phytic acid, saponins, total phenol, and ۲,۲-diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) were analyzed. The recipes were made and conduct acceptability evaluation by a ۹-point hedonic scale. The mean, standard deviation, and One-Way Analysis of Variance (proximate, antinutrient, antioxidant) were utilized as the statistical approach for the analysis of data. Results: The study revealed that some nutrient composition of RQF was found to be impressive with moisture (۱۱%), ash (۲.۱%), protein (۱۶.۶%), crude fibre (۲%), iron (۱۱.۶%), and calcium (۷۶.۱%) as compared to PQF; however, carbohydrate (۶۹.۹%), fat (۹.۶%), and vitamin C (۹.۱%) was increased in PQF, and phytic acid and saponins were decreased in all the PQF. DPPH’ free antioxidant potential was observed that RQF lowered free radical scavenging activity. In all PQF, the total phenol content was both raised and reduced. Also, proximate and antioxidant activity showed significant differences (P<۰.۰۵), and antinutrient analysis showed no significant differences (P>۰.۰۵). The two recipes were prepared as upma (soaked for ۴۸ h), and chakli (roasted at ۱۴۵ °C). Sample B of upma (۵۰% semolina with ۵۰% soaked quinoa flour) and sample A of chakli (۷۵% refined flour with ۲۵% roasted quinoa flour) were more acceptable. Conclusion: This study concluded that the use of domestic processing of quinoa seeds decreases some nutrient value compared with RQF and also infers the dietary importance of quinoa.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Mansi Chaudhary
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk, Rajasthan – ۳۰۴۰۲۲, India.
Ridhima Singh
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk, Rajasthan – ۳۰۴۰۲۲, India.
Ekta Singh Singh
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk, Rajasthan – ۳۰۴۰۲۲, India.
Bhoomika Panwar
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk, Rajasthan – ۳۰۴۰۲۲, India.
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :