Intersectoral Planning for Public Health: Dilemmas and Challenges

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 218

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

این مقاله در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-7-11_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 مرداد 1403

چکیده مقاله:

Background Intersectoral action is often presented as essential in the promotion of population health and health equity. In Norway, national public health policies are based on the Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach that promotes whole-of-government responsibility. As part of the promotion of this intersectoral responsibility, planning is presented as a tool that every Norwegian municipality should use to integrate public health policies into their planning and management systems. Although research on implementing the HiAP approach is increasing, few studies apply a planning perspective. To address this gap in the literature, our study investigates how three Norwegian municipalities experience the use of planning as a tool when implementing the HiAP approach.   Methods To investigate planning practices in three Norwegian municipalities, we used a qualitative multiple case study design based on face-to-face interviews. When analysing and discussing the results, we used the dichotomy of instrumental and communicative planning approaches, in addition to a collaborative planning approach, as the theoretical framework.   Results The municipalities encounter several dilemmas when using planning as a tool for implementing the HiAP approach. Balancing the use of qualitative and quantitative knowledge and balancing the use of structural and processual procedures are two such dilemmas. Other dilemmas include balancing the use of power and balancing action and understanding in different municipal contexts. They are also faced with the dilemma of whether to place public health issues at the forefront or to present these issues in more general terms.   Conclusion We argue that the dilemmas experienced by the municipalities might be explained by the difficult task of combining instrumental and communicative planning approaches because the balance between them is seldom fixed.

نویسندگان

Ellen Strøm Synnevåg

Faculty of Social Sciences and History, Volda University College, Volda, Norway

Roar Amdam

Faculty of Social Sciences and History, Volda University College, Volda, Norway

Elisabeth Fosse

Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Kickbusch I, Williams C, Lawless A. Making the most of ...
  • Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Policies and strategies to promote social ...
  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM. Dilemmas in a general theory of ...
  • Carey G, Crammond B, Keast R. Creating change in government ...
  • World Health Organization (WHO). The Helsinki statement on Health in ...
  • The Norwegian Public Health Act. ۲۰۱۱-۰۶-۲۴ nr ۲۹۲۰۱۱ ...
  • Hofstad H. The ambition of Health in All Policies in ...
  • Howard R, Gunther S. Health in All Policies: An EU ...
  • Paulssen E, Moltumyr A. Hvorfor folkehelse i kommunal planlegging? Folkehelse ...
  • Fosse E, Helgesen MK. How can local governments level the ...
  • Helgesen MK. Styring av folkehelsepolitikk i relasjon mellom stat, fylkeskommuner ...
  • Allmendinger P. Planning Theory. ۲nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; ۲۰۰۹ ...
  • Amdam R. Planning in Health Promotion Work: An Empowerment Model. ...
  • Davoudi S. Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory. ۲۰۱۵;۱۴(۳):۳۱۶-۳۳۱. ...
  • Alexander ER. Perhaps “Action as the practice of knowing.” Planning ...
  • Alexander ER. The role of knowledge in planning. Planning Theory. ...
  • Rydin Y. Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. ...
  • Innes JE, Booher DE. A turning point for planning theory? ...
  • Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse ...
  • Friedmann J. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to ...
  • Hendriks A-M, Jansen MWJ, Gubbels JS, De Vries NK, Molleman ...
  • Weiss D, Lillefjell M, Magnus E. Facilitators for the development ...
  • Steenbakkers M, Jansen M, Maarse H, de Vries N. Impact ...
  • Holt DH. Intersectoral policymaking for health? From policy to practice: ...
  • Bernier NF, Clavier C. Public health policy research: Making the ...
  • Barton H, Grant M. Urban planning for healthy cities. A ...
  • Barton H, Grant M, Mitcham C, Tsourou C. Healthy urban ...
  • Grant M. European Healthy City Network Phase V: Patterns emerging ...
  • Green G, Acres J, Price C, Tsouros A. City health ...
  • Green G. Intersectoral planning for city health development. Bull N ...
  • Hofstad H. Healthy urban planning: Ambitions, practices and prospects in ...
  • Jansson EVG, Tillgren PE. Health promotion at local level: A ...
  • Hagen S, Helgesen M, Torp S, Fosse E. Health in ...
  • Baum, F, Ollila, E, Peña, S. History of HiAP. In ...
  • Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. ۵th ed. ...
  • Helgesen MK, Hofstad H. Regionalt og lokalt folkehelsearbeid. Ressurser, organisering ...
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual ...
  • Layder D. Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research. London: ...
  • Attride-Stirling, J. Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. ...
  • Forester J. On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: ...
  • Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. ...
  • Carey G, Friel S. Understanding the role of public administration ...
  • Héritier A, Lehmkuhl D. The shadow of hierarchy and new ...
  • Margerum RD. Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct ...
  • Swyngedouw E. Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face ...
  • Carey G, Crammond B. Action on the social determinants of ...
  • Buanes A, Jentoft S. Building bridges: Institutional perspectives on interdisciplinarity. ...
  • Von Heimburg D, Hakkebo B. Health and equity in all ...
  • Brown C, Buzeti T. Positioning health equity and the social ...
  • Organization WH. Taking a participatory approach to development and better ...
  • Labonté RN, Laverack G. Health Promotion in Action: From Local ...
  • Breton E. A sophisticated architecture is indeed necessary for the ...
  • Banken R. Strategies for institutionalizing HIA. Health Impact Assessment Discussion ...
  • Nutbeam D. Inter-sectoral action for health: Making it work. Health ...
  • Carey G, Crammond B. Help or hindrance? Social policy and ...
  • Freiler A, Muntaner C, Shankardass K, et al. Glossary for ...
  • Leppo, K, Ollila, E, Peña, S, Wismar, M, Cook, S. ...
  • Holt DH, Frohlich KL, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Clavier, C. Intersectoriality in ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع