Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making: Assessment of Behavioral Intention Though a Tool Based on the Theory Planned Behavior

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 131

فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SDME-15-1_012

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 21 آذر 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Objectives The present study was conducted with the aim of psychometric evaluation of a tool measuring behavioral intention in relation to interprofessional shared decision-making based on the theory of planned behavior and its assessment among medical and nursing students. Methods This descriptive study was carried out in two stages. In the first stage, the psychometric properties of the interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM) tool were evaluated based on experts’ opinions. In the second stage, the participants’ behavioral intention was evaluated using the mentioned questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of five domains of cognitive attitude (۲ items), emotional attitude (۲ items), subjective norms (۳ items), perceived behavioral control (۳ items), and intention to use interprofessional shared decision-making (۳ items). Content validity of the questionnaire was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively (using the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI)). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. In the second stage, the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and Pearson’s correlation test in SPSS software. Results Qualitative and quantitative content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed based on experts’ opinions. The internal consistency of the tool, based on the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, was ۰.۹۲, and the tool’s repeatability was calculated at ۰.۸۴ using ICC. Participants in the study intended to participate in interprofessional shared decision-making. Conclusions The behavioral intention measurement tool in relation to interprofessional shared decision-making based on the theory of planned behavior has good validity and reliability in Iran. Regarding the participants’ behavioral intention to participate in shared decision-making, it is suggested that a suitable platform for shared decision-making and teamwork between health team members be provided in educational systems.

نویسندگان

Fatemeh Keshmiri

Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Jamileh Salar

Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Guerrier M, Legare F, Turcotte S, Labrecque M, Rivest LP. ...
  • Barratt A. Evidence based medicine and shared decision making: The ...
  • Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Barr H, Freeth D, ...
  • Legare F, Stacey D, Briere N, Fraser K, Desroches S, ...
  • Harden RM. Effective multiprofessional education: A threedimensional perspective. Med Teach. ...
  • World Health Organization; Department of Human Resources for Health. Health ...
  • Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed ...
  • Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative ...
  • Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision ...
  • Legare F, Stacey D, Pouliot S, Gauvin FP, Desroches S, ...
  • Word Health Organization. Learning together to work together for health. ...
  • Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative. Interprofessional education and core competencies, literature ...
  • Reeves S, Fletcher S, Barr H, Birch I, Boet S, ...
  • Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health ...
  • Legare F, Stacey D, Briere N, Robitaille H, Lord MC, ...
  • Stacey D, Samant R, Pratt M, Legare F. Feasibility of ...
  • Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. ...
  • Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: Are you ...
  • Khan KS, Chien PF. Evaluation of a clinical test. I: ...
  • Mandrekar JN. Measures of interrater agreement. J Thorac Oncol. ۲۰۱۱;۶(۱):۶–۷. ...
  • Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making–pinnacle of patient-centered care. ...
  • Pellerin MA, Elwyn G, Rousseau M, Stacey D, Robitaille H, ...
  • Deschenes SM, Gagnon MP, Legare F, Lapointe A, Turcotte S, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع