A Critical Analysis of Purism and Establishmentism Views in Indigenous Science
محل انتشار: دوفصلنامه اندیشه سیاسی اسلام، دوره: 10، شماره: 1
سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 211
فایل این مقاله در 20 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JIPT-10-1_006
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 خرداد 1402
چکیده مقاله:
Two important methods are presented for the phenomenon of religious science. One is the establishment of new religious science, and the other is the modification, reconstruction, and completion of the existing sciences. This research seeks to critique the first point of view and prepare the ground for a second view. In this way, the main circles of establishment views views (NewAkhbari, Qom Academy of Sciences, and Fardid Circle) have briefly proposed and criticized. The focuses of criticism are based on historical induction, impossibility, undesirableness, the tradition of the Prophet and imams, and the emotionality of the establishment-oriented reaction. The final solution presented inthis article is purposeful and intelligent adaptation. The first step for the phenomenon of indigenous science is the indigenous theory, and the first step for the phenomenon of indigenous theory is comparative studies
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Hamid Nassaj
Associate Professor, Faculty of Political Science, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
Seyyed Yasem Gourabi
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Political Science, Payam Noor University of Hamedan, Hamedan, Iran