The Relationship between Iranian Teachers' Experience and Education, and their Written Feedback on their Students' Papers

سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 178

فایل این مقاله در 32 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TELJ-16-2_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 مرداد 1401

چکیده مقاله:

This cross-sectional study was designed to explore the written corrective feedback (WCF) strategies employed by Iranian university teachers and the focus of their feedback; we also aimed to determine the relationship between the use of the identified strategies and the teachers' teaching experience and educational level. To this end, ۱۰۰ MA and PhD volunteer teachers with various years of experience in teaching English from different universities in Iran participated in this investigation. Each male or female participant was requested to provide the researchers with a batch of rated writing essays which contained at least ۱۵ papers. Afterwards, the collected essays were analyzed in terms of feedback strategy types and focus of feedback. To analyze the relationship between feedback strategies and teacher characteristic variables, we used the chi-square test. The findings indicated that the teachers used all the feedback strategies under study including direct, indirect, comprehensive, and selective strategies with the predominance of direct and selective ones. Besides, form followed by organization received the teachers’ attention in the current research more than other aspects of writing. The results of the chi-square test showed that education, rather than experience, had a significant relationship with the teachers’ feedback strategies and was a better predictor of the feedback strategies given by the teachers. At the end, pedagogical implications are provided for researchers and teachers interested in this area of study.

نویسندگان

Marzieh Mostafavi

Faculty of Humanities, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran

Nasrin Shokrpour

Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Shahram Afraz

Faculty of Humanities, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Al Kharusi, F.M.N. (۲۰۱۸). The practice of teachers’ written corrective ...
  • Alkhawajah, F.I. (۲۰۱۶). The effect of direct and indirect written ...
  • Alshahrani, A., & Storch, N. (۲۰۱۴). Investigating teachers’ written corrective ...
  • Ashoori Tootkaboni, A., & Khatib, M. (۲۰۱۴). The efficacy of ...
  • Barkaoui, K. (۲۰۱۰). Do ESL essay raters’ evaluation criteria change ...
  • Bitchener, J. (۲۰۰۸). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. ...
  • Budianto, S., Sulistyo, T., Widiastuti, O., F. Heriyawati, D., & ...
  • Cao, P. (۲۰۱۷). ESL teachers’ knowledge of and experience with ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۹). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ...
  • Erdosy, M.U. (۲۰۰۴). Exploring variability in judging writing ability in ...
  • Ferris, D.R. (۲۰۰۷). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. ...
  • Kaivanpanah, S., Nemati, M., & Sharifi, A. (۲۰۱۴). Iranian TOEFL/IELTS ...
  • Lee, I. (۲۰۰۴). Error correction in L۲ secondary writing classrooms: ...
  • Lee, I. (۲۰۰۸). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong ...
  • Mao, S.S., & Crosthwaite, P. (۲۰۱۹). Investigating written corrective feedback: ...
  • Modirkhamene, S., Soleimani, M., & Sadeghi, K. (۲۰۱۷). Selective vs. ...
  • Moradian, M. R. & Hossein-Nasab, M. (۲۰۱۹). Revisiting the role ...
  • Mostofee, S., Ghanbari, N., Nemati, F. (۲۰۱۶). Examining five behaviors ...
  • Negahi, M., G. Shooshtari, Z., & Vahdat, S. (۲۰۲۲). Exploring ...
  • Nagode, G. P., Pižorn, K., & Juriševič, M. (۲۰۱۴). The ...
  • Nemati, M., Alavi, S.M., & Mohebbi, H. (۲۰۱۹). Assessing the ...
  • Norouzian, R. (۲۰۱۵). Does teaching experience affect type, amount, and ...
  • Rezaei, S., Mozaffari, F., & Hatef, A. (۲۰۱۱). Corrective feedback ...
  • Salami, F.A. & Khadawardi, H. A. (۲۰۲۲). Written corrective feedback ...
  • Sheen, Y. (۲۰۰۷). The effect of focused written corrective feedback ...
  • Sheen, Y. (۲۰۱۱). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language ...
  • Teo, T., Khazaie, S., & Derakhshan, A. (۲۰۲۲). Exploring teacher ...
  • Truscott, J. (۲۰۰۷). The Effect of error correction on learners’ ...
  • Van Beuningen, C. (۲۰۱۰). Corrective feedback in L۲ writing: Theoretical ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع