Development and Validation of KOLB ۴.۰ Learning Style Questionnaire
سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 343
فایل این مقاله در 21 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JALDA-10-1_004
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 تیر 1401
چکیده مقاله:
A great deal of individual difference with reference to learners’ beliefs, thoughts, and behaviors can be explained in terms of the learning style the individuals adopt during the learning process. These learning styles have been labeled initiating, experiencing, creating / imagining, reflecting, analyzing, thinking, deciding, acting, and balancing according to Kolb and Kolb (۲۰۱۳). This research was conducted to develop and validate a multidimensional structure of the Kolb learning style inventory v. ۴.۰ (KLSI ۴.۰) in an Iranian context. KLSI ۴.۰ which is conceptualized in Experiential Learning Theory was then developed and evaluated through a series of validation procedures. Eight hundred thirty-three EFL learners studying English as ESP in IAU East Tehran Branch participated in the main phase of this study. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) through Structural Equation Modeling validated the proposed nine types KLSI ۴.۰. The outcomes of the initial piloting of the KLSI ۴.۰ did not show an acceptable fit due to high degree of correlation between some factors under the broad construct of learning style. Three factors indicating the highest degree of correlation were thus merged and the model was run again with modified six-factor LSI. Findings confirmed that learning style is a multidimensional construct in which the six factors are conceptually related. Reliability and validity estimates were examined and provided satisfactory psychometric properties of the inventory. In fact, the six-factor-correlated model of KLSI ۴.۰ revealed an acceptable model fit. Pedagogical implications and suggestions for further research were also discussed. The CFA applied in the research is distinguished from the initial assumptions in the literature and is more straightforward than originally presumed. This paper might be therefore used as a starting empirical point for further cross-validation analyses and educational implications.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Shokouh Rashvand Semiyari
Assistant Professor, TEFL Department, Faculty of Humanities, IAU University, East Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran, https://orcid.org/۰۰۰۰-۰۰۰۲-۰۱۲۶-۹۸۷۵
Mahnaz Azad
Assistant Professor, TEFL Department, Faculty of Humanities, IAU University, East Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran, https://orcid.org/۰۰۰۰-۰۰۰۱-۵۷۸۲-۵۱۰۸
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :