نقد مسئله حدوث قرآن از دیدگاه قاضی سعید قمی با توجه به مبانی ملاصدرا

The topic of occurrence or the primitiveness of the Quran is along the earliest topics within theology which has caused many disputes and arguments in beliefs and politics within the world of Islam. The Ash’ari believed in the Quran being primitive vs the Mu’tazila believed in the occurrence of the Quran. Among the scholars of Shiite, Qazi Sa’id Qomi considers the primitiveness of the Quran invalid through commentary and analysis of Ahadith narrated from Infallible Imams (a.s), hence he proves the occurrence of the Quran similar to the Mu’tazila with this difference that applying the term “Makhloogh” (creature) to Quran is not right because of the “Makzub” (wrong) meaning which it projects in minds and the fact that there is no religious absolute term supporting it. Based on Mulla Sadra’s principles, considering Quran as primitive being and an attribute of Speech will end up in having multiple primitives hence considering partner for God, and considering the Quran as an occurrence or creature will mean the substantive is possible being which its dependence is on its own occurrence adjective. Therefore Speech is a divine attribute which just like other attributes is the similar in essence in terms of objectivity and is different in terms of conceptuality.

کلیدواژه ها:

حادث ، قدیم ، قرآن ، قاضی سعید ، ملاصدرا