Conflicting Views on the Innocent Passage of Warships with Emphasis on the Practice of Iran
سال انتشار: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 250
فایل این مقاله در 30 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_IRLSMP-1-2_012
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 دی 1400
چکیده مقاله:
The conflict between sovereignty over parts of the sea and the necessity of "innocent passage" concept has been the most contentious field in the law of the sea." Two hypotheses in this field have collided in the history of international law of the sea. The first hypothesis is that every human possesses the seas together. "Navigation" and other operations are also allowed for all. Under the excuse of owning the sea, no state has the right to restrict other people's use. However, the second theory says that the sea is owned by someone who controls part of it, and its use can be limited. In international law, the "innocent passage" by foreign vessels from the territorial sea of a country is widely recognized. However, in some territories, the requirements for the "innocent passage" of military vessels include the need for prior notice or the coastal state's permission. Most forces, led by the US, believe in absolute freedom of the military vessel's "innocent passage." However, most Asian countries, including Iran, assume that they can prior notification or approval for a foreign military vessel passage. This activity was often resisted in operational as well as diplomatic phases by naval forces such as the United States.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Heybatallah Najandimanesh
Assistant Professor of Public International Law, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran
Esmaeil Karimipour
Department of International Law, Islamic Azad University of Bushehr, Bushehr, Iran
SeyedAli Hosseini Balajadeh
Economic and Private Law. Facualty of Law and Political science. Allameh Tabatabayi University. Iran. Tehran.
Ameneh Mozouni
Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law & Political Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :