The Effect of Mixed and Matched Level Dyadic Interaction on Iranian EFL Learners’ Comprehension and Production of Requests and Apologies

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 309

فایل این مقاله در 30 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-35-1_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Drawing upon sociocultural theory of Vygotsky, the current study aims to investigate the effect of dyadic interaction in mixed and matched level proficiency pairings on comprehension and production of request and apology speech acts. The participants were ۱۲۵ EFL learners who were randomly assigned to control and experimental (interaction) groups. Based on their scores in the pretest including a pragmatic listening test and an Oral Discourse Completion Test (ODCT), those in the experimental groups were assigned to the mixed (H-L) and matched level (H-H and L-L) dyads. Both the control and experimental groups received metapragmatic instruction on speech acts; however, the experimental groups were engaged in collaborative problem-solving tasks on speech acts for nine sessions. Following the treatment, the posttest was administered, the results of which revealed the outperformance of the interaction groups compared with the control group. Moreover, mixed level dyads were found to outperform their matched level counterparts in both measures of comprehension and production of speech acts. The findings have pedagogical implications for L۲ teachers and practitioners on how to best pair learners in collaborative activities.

نویسندگان

Zahra Fakher

Pyame Noor university

Fereidoon Vahdany

Payame Noor University of Guilan

Manoochehr Jafarigohar

Payame Noor University of Tehran

Hassan Soleimani

Payame Noor University of Tehran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  •  Alcon, E. (2002). Relationship between teacher-led versus learners’ interaction and ...
  • Ansalone, G. (2000). Keeping on track: A reassessment of tracking ...
  • Baleghizadeh, S., TimchehMemar, H., & TimchehMemar, A. (2010). The effect ...
  • Baradaran, A., & Sarfarazi, B. (2011). The impact of scaffolding ...
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize ...
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Griffin, R. (2005). L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence ...
  • Birjandi, P., & Rezaei, S. (2010). Developing a multiple-choice discourse ...
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in ...
  • Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In ...
  • Edstrom, A. (2015). Triads in the L2 classroom: Interaction patterns ...
  •      Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. ...
  • Gass, S. M. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for ...
  • Hawkins, B. (2015). Using sociocultural theory to examine the context(s) ...
  • Jernigan, J. E. (2007). Instruction and developing second language pragmatic ...
  • The effect of peer and teacher scaffolding on the reading comprehension of EFL learners in asymmetrical and symmetrical groups [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic development in a ...
  • Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner ...
  • Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production ...
  • Lantolf, J. (1994). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Modern ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory ...
  • Leeser, M.J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during ...
  • Liu, J. (2006). Assessing EFL learners’ interlanguage pragmatic knowledge: ...
  • Implications for testers and teachers. Reflections on English Language Teaching, ...
  • Liu, J. (2007). Developing a pragmatics test for Chinese EFL ...
  • LoCastro, V.  (2003). An introduction to pragmatics: Social action for ...
  • Maftoon, P., & Ghafoori, N. (2009). A comparative study of ...
  • MemariHanjani, A., & Li, L. (2014). Exploring L2 writers’ collaborative ...
  • Murphy, Ph. (2007). Reading comprehension exercises online: The effect of ...
  • Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis ...
  • Poorahmadi, M. (2009). The effect of employing scaffolding strategies and ...
  • Rahimi Domakani, M., & Felfelian, S. (2012). L2 learner interlanguage ...
  • Rahimi Domakani, M., Hashemian, M., & Mansoori, S. (2013). Pragmatic ...
  • Razavi, A., & Tabatabaei, O. (2014). The effect of dynamic ...
  • Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing ...
  • Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. ...
  • Song, L., & Liu, L. D. (2002). Apologies in Chinese ...
  • Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair ...
  • Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition ...
  • Taguchi, N. (2011). Rater variation in the assessment of speech ...
  • Tajeddin, Z., & Tayebipour, F. (2012). The effect of dynamic ...
  • van Compernolle, R. , & Kinginger, C. (2013). Promoting metapragmatic ...
  • van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, ...
  • Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes ...
  • Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation. New York: ...
  • Wu, M. Y. (2008). The impact of English proficiency on ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع