Raising EFL Learners' Pragmatic Awareness of Intercultural Rhetoric in Writing

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 172

فایل این مقاله در 29 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-34-1_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

The purpose of the present study was to explore the effectiveness of raising Iranian learners’ pragmatic awareness of intercultural rhetoric in enhancing their L۲ writing ability, complexity, and accuracy. To this end, two ۲۵-member groups of EFL learners who were taking Basic Writing course at Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch, were selected based on their performance on a language proficiency test (PET). They were assigned as one control and one experimental group and took a validated, researcher-made pretest/posttest (with the reliability of ۰.۷۳) at the outset of the study. The experimental group received the explicit instruction of the teacher on IR followed by a task related to the content of the instruction while the control group’s practice in writing was limited to doing the exercises in their course book without receiving the explicit instruction on IR.Following the termination of the nine-session treatment, the posttest was administered and the collected data underwent data analysis. The results indicated that pragmatic awareness of IR in writing was significantly effective in improving the Iranian EFL learners' writing ability as well as the accuracy of their written output. However, no significant influence of rhetorical awareness raising on learners’ writing complexity was investigated in this study.

نویسندگان

Andisheh Saniei

ELT Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Parviz Birjandi

ELT Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Esmaeel Abdollahzadeh

ELT Department, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

Majid Nemati

ELT Department, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Arnaudet, M. L., & Barrett, M. L. (1990). Paragraph development ...
  • Bailey, E. P., & Powell, P. A. (2003). The practical ...
  • Baleghizadeh, S., & Pashaii, A. (2010). A Comparison of English ...
  • Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles (2nd ed.), New ...
  • Connor, U. (2002). New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, ...
  • Connor, U. (2004a). Introduction. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, ...
  • Connor, U. (2004b). Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal of ...
  • Connor, U. (2011). Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. Ann ...
  • Connor, U., & Traversa, A. (2014). The Role of intercultural ...
  • Davies, R. J. (2003). Written discourse across cultures I: Towards ...
  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ...
  • Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning ...
  • Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice ...
  • Hartshorn, K. J. (2008). The effects of manageable corrective feedback ...
  • Hassani, M. T. (2004). Contrastive Rhetoric of English and Persian: ...
  • Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Ishikawa, T. (2006). The effect of task complexity and language ...
  • Jalilifar, A. (2008). Discourse markers in composition writings: The case ...
  • Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. ...
  • Kaplan, R. B. (1987). Cultural thought patterns revisited. In U. ...
  • Kaplan, R. B. (2001). What in the World is Contrastive ...
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy ...
  • Leki, I. (1991). Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: Text analysis ...
  • Li, X. (2008). From contrastive rhetoric to intercultural rhetoric: A ...
  • Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner ...
  • Marandi, S. (2002). Contrastive EAP rhetoric: Metadiscourse in Persian vs. ...
  • Masney, D. (1997). Linguistic awareness and writing: Exploring the relationship ...
  • Meyers, A. (2006). Composing with confidence: Writing effective paragraphs and ...
  • Moradian, M. R. (2006). Monotopicality and multitopicality in Persian and ...
  • Oi, K., & Kamimura, T. (1997). A pedagogical application of ...
  • Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step ...
  • Polio, C.G. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language ...
  • Purves, A., & Purves, W. (1986). Viewpoints: Cultures, text models, ...
  • Qi, D.S., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of ...
  • Rahimi, M. (2011). Discourse markers in argumentative and expository writing ...
  • Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in ...
  • Shen, S., & Yao, H. (1999). The impact of Chinese ...
  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research ...
  • Walker, D. (2004). Contrastive rhetoric teaching methods for English   as ...
  • Walker, D. (2006).Improving Korean university student EFL academic writing with ...
  • Walker, D. (2011). How to teach contrastive (intercultural) rhetoric: Some ...
  • Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Wishnoff, J. R. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners’ acquisition ...
  • Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.Y. (1998). Second language ...
  • Yoshimura, T. (2002). Formal instruction of rhetorical patterns and the ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع