The Investigation of the Perspectives of Iranian EFL Domain Experts on Postmethod Pedagogy: A Delphi Technique

سال انتشار: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 186

فایل این مقاله در 24 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-33-3_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

After the introduction of postmethod pedagogy by Kumaravadivelu with its three principles of particularity, possibility and practicality, a wave of attention was directed towards this so-called 'postmethod era' and its appropriacy and adequacy in satiating the demands of the language learners in this 'brand new world'. This situation has created a healthy debate among the Iranian EFL community as well. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of the Iranian EFL domain experts about postmethod pedagogy. In so doing, the Delphi technique was adopted to reach ‘expert’ consensus. The participants of this study were ۲۱ domain experts in the field of applied linguistics in Iran. The Delphi technique was a remarkably quick means of achieving a consensus on postmethod pedagogy for participants. Three waves of data collection were employed in the three rounds of Delphi with the same sample. The findings of this study raised much doubt and uncertainty about both method and post method pedagogy. It was revealed that the Iranian language education has never experienced method in its actual meaning, what it is known as the method has been an eclectic approach any teacher has adhered to simply based on his/her personal taste. Moreover, the findings of the Delphi technique indicated that postmethod pedagogy with its three principles is not applicable in the Iranian context. Finally, the theoretical and practical implications of this study are discussed.

نویسندگان

Mohammad Khatib

Allameh Tabataba&#۰۳۹;i University

Jalil Fathi

Allameh Tabataba&#۰۳۹;i University

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Akbari, R. (2005). Recent developments in foreign language teaching. ROSHD ...
  • Akbari, R. (2008). Postmethod discourse and practice.TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 641-652. ...
  • Allwright, R. L. (1991). The death of the method (Working ...
  • Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: rethinking practitioner research in language ...
  • Arikan, A. (2006). Postmethod condition and its implications for English ...
  • Ary, D., Jacobs, C., & Razavieh, A. (1990). Introduction to ...
  • Atai, M. R., & Gheitanchian, M. (2009).Iranian EFL teachers’ attitudes ...
  • Beech, B. (1999). Go the extra mile – use the ...
  • Beech, B. (2001). The Delphi approach: recent applications in health ...
  • Bell, D. (2003). Method and postmethod: Are they really incompatible? ...
  • Barnette, J., Danielson, L.C. & Algozzine, R.F. (1978). Delphi methodology: ...
  • Beretta, R. (1996).A critical review of the Delphi Technique. Nurse ...
  • Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. ...
  • Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach ...
  • Buck, A.J., Gross, M., Hakim, S. &Weinblatt, J. (1993). Using ...
  • Clayton, M.J. (1997). Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion ...
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods ...
  • Dalkey, N. &Helmer, O. (1963) An experimental application of the ...
  • Delport, S. (2010).Exploring postmethod pedagogy with Mozambican secondary school teachers. ...
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • Eggers, R.M. & Jones, C.M. (1998).Practical considerations for conducting Delphi ...
  • Farrell, P. & Scherer, K. (1983) The Delphi technique as ...
  • Gholami, J., &Mirzaei, A. (2013). Post-method EFL teaching in Iran: ...
  • Graneheim, U. H., &Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in ...
  • Hansen, D. (2001). Exploring the moral heart of teaching. New ...
  • Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. Cassell: London. ...
  • Harklau, L. (2005). Ethnography and ethnographic research on second language ...
  • Hazratzad,  A.,  & Gheitanchian,  M.  (2009).  EFL  teachers’  attitudes  towards  ...
  • Holliday, A. (2002). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: SAGE ...
  • Johnson, K., & Johnson, H. (1999).Encyclopaedic dictionary of applied linguistics. ...
  • Khatib, M., &Fat'hi, J. (2012). Postmethod pedagogy and ELT teachers. ...
  • Keeney, S., F. Hasson, & H. McKenna.(2011). The Delphi technique ...
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The Postmethod Condition: (E) merging strategies for ...
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), ...
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003a). Critical language pedagogy: a postmethod perspective on ...
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003b). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New ...
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2005). In defence of postmethod. ILI Language Teaching ...
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. ...
  • Landeta, J. (2006).Current validity of the Delphi method in social ...
  • Larson-Freeman, D. (2005a).A critical analysis of postmethod. ILI Language Teaching ...
  • Larson-Freeman, D. (2005b).On the appropriateness of language teaching methods in ...
  • Linstone, H.A. &Turoff, M. (1975).The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. ...
  • Liu, D.  (1995). Comments  on B. Kumaravadivelu’s  The  post-method  condition:  ...
  • Marton, W. (1988). Methods in English language teaching: Frameworks and ...
  • Mayring, p. (2000).Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2) ...
  • McKenna, H.P. (1994) The Delphi technique: a worthwhile approach for ...
  • Moore, C.M. (1987) Delphi technique and the mail questionnaire. In: ...
  • Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and ...
  • Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, ...
  • Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal ...
  • Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method-why? TESOL ...
  • Razmjoo, S. A., Ranjbar, H., &Hoomanfard, M. H. (2013).On the ...
  • Richards, J. C. (2000). Beyond training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Hampshire, England: McMillan. ...
  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and ...
  • Stern, H.H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: ...
  • Walker, A.M. & Selfe, J. (1996). The Delphi method: A ...
  • Williams, P.L. &Webb, C. (1994) The Delphi technique: An adaptive ...
  • Yousuf, M.I. (2007). The Delphi technique. Essays in Education, 20, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع