Task Type and Prompt Effect on Test Performance: A Focus on IELTS Academic Writing Tasks

سال انتشار: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 178

فایل این مقاله در 20 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-33-3_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Recent versions of international high-stakes tests like TOEFL and IELTS have made use of integrated tasks in addition to the traditional independent tasks in a claim to provide a more realistic estimation of the test takers’ language abilities. The present study aimed to investigate how test takers’ performance may differ on such tasks. As such, the test takers’ performance was compared on IELTS Academic Writing Tasks ۱ and ۲. Whereas Task ۱ is an integrated task which calls for graphic interpretation and description, Task ۲ is an independent task of writing an argumentative essay. Furthermore, the study also aimed to investigate the effect of writing prompts on the test takers’ performance on such tasks. The study adopted a quasi-experimental design in the form of posttest-only group. Fifty six Iranian EFL learners at Shiraz University were selected based on their availability. After receiving instruction in a semester on how to do the two tasks, they received ۴ writing tasks (۲ versions of each task with different prompts). The data collected were analyzed through two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. The results indicated that task type did not have a significant effect on the test takers’ writing performance; that is, there were no significant differences between the participants’ performance on the independent and integrated writing tasks. Furthermore, the effect of prompts was only found to be significant on the participants’ performance on task ۲ (independent task). The findings provide evidence for higher consistency of scores obtained from different versions of the integrated task.

نویسندگان

Alireza Ahmadi

Shiraz University

Shaban Mansoordehghan

Islamic Azad University of Hashtgerd

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Brown, J. D. H. (1998). An investigation into approaches to ...
  • Charge, N., & Taylor, L. B. (1997). Recent developments in ...
  • Cho, Y. (2003). Assessing writing: Are we bound by only ...
  • Cho, Y., Rijmen, F., & Novak, J. (2013). Investigating the ...
  • Cohen, J. W.  (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral ...
  • Elder, C., & O’Loughlin, K. (2003). Investigating the relationship between ...
  • Ellis, M., Chong, S., & Choy, Z. (2013). IELTS  as  ...
  • Fox, J. (2003). From products to process: An ecological approach ...
  • Friel, S., Bright, F., & Curcio, G. (2001). Making sense ...
  • Gao, X., & Brennan, R. (2001). Variability of estimated variance ...
  • Gebril, A. (2006). Independent and Integrated academic writing tasks: A ...
  • Gebril, A. (2009). Score generalizability of academic writing tasks: Does ...
  • Gebril, A., & Plakans, L. (2009). Investigating source use, discourse ...
  • Golder, K., Reeder, K., & Fleming, S. (2011). Determination of ...
  • Green, A. (2005). EAP study recommendations and score gains on ...
  • Green, A. (2007). Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study ...
  • Grabe, W. (2001). Reading-writing relations: Theoretical perspectives and instructional practices. ...
  • Guo, L. (2011). Product and process in TOEFL iBT independent ...
  • Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Pre-text: Task-related influences on the writer. In ...
  • Hamp-Lyons, L., & Kroll, B. (1996). Issues in ESL writing ...
  • He, L., & Shi, L. (2012). Topical knowledge and ESL ...
  • International English Language Testing System [IELTS]. (2002). The IELTS handbook. ...
  • Jennings, M., Fox, J., Graves, B., & Shohamy, E. (1999). ...
  • Kroll, B., & Reid, J. (1994). Guidelines for designing writing ...
  • Lee, Y., & Kantor, R. (2005). Dependability of new ESL ...
  • Mackey, A., & Gass, M. G. (2005). Second language research: ...
  • McCarter, S. (2002). Academic writing practice for IELTS. Retrieved from ...
  • Mickan, P., Slater, S., & Gibson, C. (2000). Study of ...
  • Moore, T., & Morton, J. (1999). Authenticity in the IELTS ...
  • Moore, T. & Morton, J. (2005). Dimensions of difference: A ...
  • Moore, T. & Morton, J. (2007). Authenticity in the IELTS ...
  • O’Loughlin, K., & Wigglesworth, G. (2003). Task design in IELTS ...
  • Plakans, L. (2007). Second language writing and reading-to-write assessment tasks: ...
  • Plakans, L. (2009). Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing ...
  • Rao, C., McPherson, K., Chand, R., & Khan, V. (2003). ...
  • Read, J., & Hayes, B. (2003). The impact of the ...
  • Schoonen, R. (2005). Generalizability of writing scores: An application of ...
  • Shah, P., & Freedman, E. G. (2011). Bar and line ...
  • Spack, R. (1993). Student meets text, text meets student: Finding ...
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate ...
  • Upshur, J. A., & Turner, C. E. (1999). Systematic effects ...
  • Uysal, H. H. (2010). A critical review of the IELTS ...
  • Weigle, S. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Weigle, S. (2004). Integrating reading and writing in a competency ...
  • Yang, H. C. (2012). Modeling the relationships between test-taking strategies ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع