A Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Ranking the Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback Strategies: Monolingual Persian Versus Bilingual Turkmen EFL Learners

سال انتشار: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 298

فایل این مقاله در 34 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-40-1_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Corrective feedback (CF) as a multifaceted practice needs to be explored from different perspectives. Achieving relative consensus among language teachers and experts in a particular context on the most effective CF strategy for monolingual and bilingual language learners appears to be understudied. As such, a fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) model was applied to accommodate varied and conflicting opinions in ranking the effect of three corrective feedback strategies including mid-focused oral metalinguistic CF, written metalinguistic CF, and oral/written metalinguistic CF. To this end, ۷۹ monolingual Persians and ۷۹ bilingual Turkmens aged between ۱۳ and ۱۸ from two language institutes in Golestan Province of Iran participated in the study comprising three experimental and one control group each. The experimental groups were provided with CF strategies on their most recurrent grammatical errors detected through pretests while the control groups received none. The results of the fuzzy TOPSIS approach ranked oral/written metalinguistic CF and oral metalinguistic CF as the best strategies for monolingual Persians and bilingual Turkmens respectively. The fuzzy TOPSIS approach provided experts with the opportunity to include their opinions on the weight of criteria and the impact of CF strategies towards enhancing the experts’ agreement on the issue. It was shown that a single CF strategy might not be appropriate for all EFL learners in different contexts. The approach also provided a framework for soliciting wider participation of the experts when conditions favor the application of multi-criteria decision-making methods, or speedier assessments are required.

نویسندگان

Maryam Moazzeni Limoudehi

Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran

Omid Mazandarani

Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran

Behzad Ghonsooly

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Jila Naeini

Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Aghajanloo, K., Mobini, F., & Khosravi, R. (2016). The effect ...
  • Ahmadian, M., Mehri, E., & Ghaslani, R. (2019). The effect ...
  • Al Mubarak, A. A. (2017). An investigation of academic writing ...
  • Alaa, M., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Singh, C. K. ...
  • Al-Hammadi, A. S., & Milne, R. H. (2004). A neuro-fuzzy ...
  • Amin, M. Y., & Saadatmanesh, S. (2018). Discovering the effectiveness ...
  • Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written ...
  • Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. ...
  • Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback ...
  • Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The relative effectiveness of ...
  •  Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written ...
  • Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for ...
  • Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect ...
  • Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies ...
  • Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error ...
  • Cohen, A. D. (2018). Reflections on a career in second ...
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods ...
  • Du, J. (2018). Evaluation method of English teaching quality based ...
  • Duc, D. A., Thach, P. N., Phuong, B. H., Dung, ...
  • Eastwood, J. (2003). Oxford practice grammar for intermediate (2nd ed). ...
  • Ebadi, E. (2014). The effect of focused metalinguistic corrective feedback ...
  • Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ...
  • Ertuğrul Í., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2007). Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ...
  • Eslami, Z., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Promoting advantageous ways for ...
  • Fedrizi, M., & Molinari, A. (2013). A multi-expert fuzzy TOPSIS-based ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (1995). Teaching students to self-edit. TESOL Journal, ...
  • Hosseini Bay, Z., & Dehghan, M. (2019). The effects of ...
  • Hota, H. S., Sharma L. K., & Pavani, S. (2014). ...
  • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision-making: ...
  • Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language ...
  • Ivanova, V., & Zlatanov, B. (2019). Application of fuzzy logic ...
  • Johns, A. M. (1995). Genre and pedagogical purposes. Journal of ...
  • Karim, K. & Nassaji, H. (2019). The effects of written ...
  • Khaki, M., & Heidari Tabrizi, H. (2021). Assessing the effect ...
  • Kheradmand Saadi, Z., & Saadat, M. (2015). Iranian EFL learners’ ...
  • Khoshi, A., Gooshki, H. S., & Mahmoudi, N. (2018). The ...
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. ...
  • Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research ...
  • Liu, Y. (2015). Research on the foreign language teaching effectiveness ...
  • Lyster, R. M., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and ...
  • Moayeri, M., Shahvarani, A., Behzadi, M. H., & Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi, F. ...
  • Murphy, M., & Smalzer, W. R. (2009). Grammar in use ...
  • Nădăban, S., Dzitac, S., & Dzitac, I. (2016). Fuzzy TOPSIS: ...
  • Nassaji, H. (2017). The effectiveness of extensive versus intensive recasts ...
  • Nassaji, H., & Kartchava, E. (eds.) (2017). Corrective feedback in ...
  • Pavani, S., Sharma, L. K., & Hota, H. S. (2013).  ...
  • Pedrycz, W., Ekel, P., & Parreiras, R. (2011). Fuzzy multi-criteria ...
  • Rezaei, S., & Derakhshan, A. (2011). Investigating recast and metalinguistic ...
  • Sadat, T., Zarifi, A., Sadat, A., & Malekzadeh, J. (2015). ...
  • Sahin, B., Leung Yip, T. L., Tseng, P. H., Kabak, ...
  • Salehi, M., & Bahrami, A. (2018). An error analysis of ...
  • Schulze, M., & Smith, B. (2015). In theory, we could ...
  • Shafiee Sarvestani, M., & Pishkar, K. (2016). The effect of ...
  • Shahballa, A. H., & Alamdar Youli, F. (2012). Reading comprehension ...
  • Shahballa, A., Ghonsooly, B., & Karami, H. (2019). Developing and ...
  • Sinha, S. (2017). Fuzzy logic-based teaching/learning of a foreign language ...
  • Sobrino, A. (2013). Fuzzy logic and education: Teaching the basics ...
  • Truscott, J. (1996). Review article: The case against grammar correction ...
  • Wang, R. (2016). Improvement of flipped classroom teaching model based ...
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), ...
  • Zadeh, L. A. (2008). Is there a need for fuzzy ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع