The Impact of Dynamic Assessment on Iranian EFL Students’ Writing Self-Assessment

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 220

فایل این مقاله در 25 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TELJ-9-1_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

The rise of sociocultural theory has pushed up the value of dynamic assessment as one of the alternatives to traditional testing. The purpose of this study was to investigate (a) Iranian EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners’ self-assessment and self-rating of their writing ability and the effect of dynamic-assessment-based course on their accuracy, and (b) the interrelationships among teacher rating, self-assessment, and self-rating in the writing performance of twenty two engineering students taking a writing course as part of a general English course. Conducting descriptive statistics, correlational analyses, and t-tests revealed that the participants overrated their writing ability as measured against teacher rating before their exposure to the dynamic-assessment-based course. While they got close to each other after dynamic assessment and high correlations among all participants’ self-rating, self-assessment, and teacher ratings proved the impact of dynamic assessment. The results suggest that dynamic assessment could help Iranian EFL learners to get a better awareness of their criteria for writing evaluation, and subsequently they become more accurate in assessing their own writing ability, and this is a step forward in education.

نویسندگان

Minoo Alemi

Islamic Azad University, Tehran-west Branch

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (1989). The construct validation ...
  • Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge ...
  • Bates, L., Lane, J., & Lange, E. (1993). Writing clearly: ...
  • Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practice. ...
  • Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in ...
  • Butler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of ...
  • Cook, V. J. (1991). Second language learning and language teaching. ...
  • Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (1995). Teaching ESL composition students to become ...
  • Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational ...
  • Harris, M. (1997). Self-assessment of language learning in formal settings. ...
  • Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and challenges ...
  • Hendrickson, J. M. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: ...
  • Higgs, T., & Clifford, R. (1982). The push toward communication. ...
  • Huerta-Macias, A. (2002). Alternative Assessment: Response to commonly asked questions. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language ...
  • Krashen, S. D. (1984). Writing: Research, theory and application. Oxford: ...
  • Kroll, B. (2001). Consideration for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. ...
  • Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2007). Language proficiency ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory ...
  • Levykh, M. G. (2008). The affective establishment and maintenance of ...
  • Lynch, B. K. (2001). Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective. ...
  • Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university ...
  • Murphy, R. and Maree, D.J.F. (2006). A review of South ...
  • Oscarson, M. (1989). Self-assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications. ...
  • Poehner, M .E. & J. P. Lantolf. (2005). Dynamic assessment ...
  • Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to ...
  • Selinker, L. (1992). Rediscovering interlanguage. London: Longman. ...
  • Truscot, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 ...
  • Wang, T. H. (2010). Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as ...
  • Xiaoxiao, L. & Yan, L. (2010). A case study of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع