Stance in English Research Articles: Two Disciplines of the Same Science

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 249

فایل این مقاله در 27 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TELJ-9-1_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Research in academic writing has revealed a strong tendency on the part of writers to interactively communicate their stance with their readers. This study targets the stance component of writer-reader interaction by integrating Hyland’s (۲۰۰۵b) and Hyland and Tse’s (۲۰۰۵) frameworks to investigate psychology and sociology English research articles; the former for lexical stance markers and the latter for grammatical evaluative that construction. The corpus included ۱۰۰ English research articles published during ۲۰۱۲-۲۰۱۴, ۵۰ from each field, yielding a total number of ۹۲۲,۴۰۰ words. The data were first analyzed by AntConc (Anthony, ۲۰۱۴) and, to ensure maximum reliability, a crosscheck was carried out by the researchers to discard the anomalies. Moreover, chi-square was run to compare the results. The results suggested remarkable similarities and significant differences between those disciplines. Based on the findings, some implications are drawn with plausible applicability in academic writing and EAP syllabus design. Finally, suggestions are put forward for future research.

نویسندگان

Esmat Babaii

Kharazmi University of Tehran

Mahmood Atai

Kharazmi University of Tehran

Vali Mohammadi

Kharazmi University of Tehran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Abdi, R. (2002). Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and ...
  • Abdi, R. (2011). Metadiscourse strategies in research articles: A study ...
  • Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement ...
  • Abdollahzadeh, E., & Zolfaghari-Erdechi, F. (2012). Exploring the relationship between ...
  • Aikhenvald, A. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.         ...
  • Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc. [Computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. ...
  • Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in ...
  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: ...
  • Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. ...
  • Bondi, M. (2007). Authority and expert voices in the discourse ...
  • Englebretson, R. (2007). Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction. In R. ...
  • Flowerdew, J. (Ed.). (2002). Academic discourse. Harlow: Longman. ...
  • Gross, A. G., & Chesley, P. (2012). Hedging, stance and ...
  • Gunnarsson, B. L. (2009). Professional discourse. London: Continuum. ...
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as a social semiotic: ...
  • Harwood, N. (2005). I hoped to counteract the memory problem, ...
  • Hempel, S., & Degand, L. (2008). Qualitative analysis of sequencers ...
  • Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D. (2001). Coming back to voice: ...
  • Hu, M., & Nation, I.S.P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and ...
  • Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial ...
  • Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research ...
  • Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John ...
  • Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in ...
  • Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum: London. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction ...
  • Hyland, K. (2005c). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert ...
  • Hyland, K. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: Disciplinary variation ...
  • Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing (2nd ed.). London: ...
  • Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular ...
  • Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A ...
  • Ifantidou, E. (2005). The semantics and pragmatics of metadiscourse. Journal ...
  • Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of ...
  • Jaffe, A. (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ...
  • Jalilifar, A. (2014). Directions in discourse analysis: Theory and method. ...
  • Jalilifar, A., Alipour, M., & Parsa, S. (2014).Comparative study of ...
  • Journal Citation Reports. (2005). Social sciences edition. New York: Thompson ...
  • Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: ...
  • McGrath, L., & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in ...
  • Neff, J., Dafouz, E., Herrere, H., Martines, F., & Rica, ...
  • Parkinson, J. (2011). The Discussion section as argument: The language ...
  • Pishghadam, R., & Norouz Kermanshahi, P. (2012).Writers’ stance-taking in EFL ...
  • Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of ...
  • Stoller, F. L., & Robinson, M. S. (2012). Chemistry journal ...
  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English for specific purpose in ...
  • Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. New ...
  • Taki, S., & Jafarpour, F. (2012). Engagement and stance in ...
  • Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation: An introduction. In ...
  • Tse, P. (2012). Stance in academic bios. In K. Hyland ...
  • Tse, P., & Hyland, K. (2009). Discipline and gender: Constructing ...
  • Tse, P., & Hyland, K. (2008). Robot Kung fu: Gender ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع