An assessment of the current status of the organizational structure and its dimensions in medical universities for transition to the third generation university

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 611

فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_FMEJ-8-4_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 تیر 1398

چکیده مقاله:

Background: In today s competitive world, it is hardly possible to achieve strategic goals without having a well-structured organization. Therefore, universities need to focus on improving their organizational structure in order to achieve their goals and sustain their activities. The purpose of this study was to assess the current status of organizational structure dimensions in universities of medical sciences for transition to the third-generation university. Methods: This was a descriptive-analytic study. The statistical population included all managers and healthcare management specialists in universities of medical sciences of the 9th Planning Macro-Region of the country totaling 614 individuals. Using Cochran’s formula, 265 people were selected randomly via stratified random sampling method. To collect data, a researcher-made questionnaire was used, which held 52 items on the 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was confirmed by faculty members in terms of formal and content validity, and its reliability was obtained through Cronbach s alpha coefficient as 0.95. SPSS14 software and descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: The results showed that the mean scores for all structural dimensions in the universities of medical sciences were lower than average (score=3) in the present situation, including informal relationships (2.43 ± 0.63), trust-based relationships (2.57 ± 0.61), interaction-based relationships (2.52 ± 0.49), emotion-based relationships (2.72 ± 0.54), formalization (2.82 ± 0.64), complexity (2.99 ± 0.52), concentration (2.83 ± 0.49), and professionalism (2.90 ± 0.50). These relationships were statistically significant (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: According to the results, universities of medical sciences require a fundamental change in their current organizational structure in order for transition to the third-generation university.

کلیدواژه ها:

Organizational structure ، Transition to third generation university ، University of medical sciences

نویسندگان

Mohammadreza Raeisoon

PhD Student, Department of Management and Educational Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

Abbas Abbaspour

Department of Management and Educational Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba i University, Tehran, Iran

Hamid Rahimian

Department of Management and Educational Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba i University, Tehran, Iran

Ali Khorsandi Taskoh

Department of Educational Planning and administration, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabae i University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Nemati MA, Mohammadi Y, Raeisoon MR. Relationship between knowledge management ...
  • Vatankhah N, Rezai Moghaddam K. Components and barriers of the ...
  • Gholipour Solymani A, Talebi kelidbari S. University and entrepreneurship features ...
  • Torkzadeh J, Dehghan Harati F. Developing and validating a scale ...
  • Kalay F, Lynn GS. The impact of organizational structure on ...
  • Ayers D, Dahlstrom R, Skinner SJ. An exploratory investigation of ...
  • Strese S, Meuer MW, Flatten TC, Brettel M. Organizational antecedents ...
  • Miles RE, Snow CC. Organization theory and supply chain management: ...
  • Kordnaiej A, Ahmadpour M, Shams S. Designing the organizational structure ...
  • Mintzberg, H. Structure in 5 designing effective organizations. Faghihi A, ...
  • Jofreh M, Baba Beik R. Conflict Management Strategies and Organizational ...
  • Aghajani HA, Alizadeh R. Organic or mechanical evaluation of existing ...
  • Izadi Yazdan Abadi A, Behrangi MR. Evaluation and analysis of ...
  • Marshale S, Maureen LA, Russell SC. The effect of organizational ...
  • Katsikea E, Theodosiou M, Perdikis N, Kehagias J. The effects ...
  • Kezar A, Eckel P. The effect of institutional culture on ...
  • Faramarzinia Z, Farhadi Rad H, Mehralizadeh Y. Analysis of the ...
  • Monavarian A. The development structural components in fit with knowledge ...
  • Mortazai H, Salehi M, Niaz Azari K. Identify factors affecting ...
  • Mohammadi Kangarani H, Ghonchepour D. Delineation and analysis of intra ...
  • Bagheri M, Dehnad H. Comparison of the effect of informal ...
  • Claver S, Zaragoza-Sa´ez P, Pertusa O. Organizational structure features supporting ...
  • Davidsson P. The domain of entrepreneurship research: Some suggestions. In: ...
  • Aghababaei R, Rahimi H. The study of structural aspects of ...
  • http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-300-fa.html ...
  • Wissema, JG. Towards the third generation university: Managing the university ...
  • Jadidi R, Memari F, Anbari Z. The relationship between organizational ...
  • Yadollahi Farsi J, Zali MR, Bagheri SM. Recognizing affective structural ...
  • Bernardo, A. Hierarchical structure and search in complex organizations. Manage ...
  • Vaezi R, Sabzikaran E. Relationship between organizational structure and personnel ...
  • Nasiri Velik Bani F, Shaygani Manie S. The relationship between ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع